MBSL: I read your priors to this. The cases in two line theory you mention also have two others. These are D max C and C min D. They are as important as the crossover. Having all of the cases, then allows you to build the OOE's of the cases. Having this complete finite set to finite set knowledge, then you can move to "knowing you always know". Sorry for my delay. I was glad to see that someone explained the relationship of taxes and income. The IRS still does not understand the concept of trade secrets and just who gets to see what. they feel they are the empowered retdactors (but they aren't so far).
As you look at monitoring and analyzing several fractals, it is important to know where you are on your trading fractal. The faster fractal is having three moves for each move on the trading fractal. As you go through the succession of the 3:1 ratio, you see legs of the trading fractal more or less pause as the faster fractal is doing its non dominant middle leg. So at this time there is no crossover by the fast line of the slow line. There is convergence and a minimum and then divergence. All of this tells you to hold through the non dom faster fractal move. When using indicators to trade, once their defaults afford proper synchronization, then you can read several fractals on the indicators. A very important thing is to mentally evelop the skills to "read" two line indicators as leading indicators. This skill is gained by learning the OOE of each fractal on the two lines; then you adjust the OOE to be read just as you add a phase angle to a sinusoid. Two line indicators have a lot of signals and each sunset applied to the OOE of each of the nested fractals. As a trader's skill increases, he considers trading more frequently than FTT to FTT. If he has watched the two line indicators with sensitiviety, he can easily switch to more frequent trading. Elsewhere there is a thread on effectiveness on several different approaches and strategies. There you see a yield per 100K for a combo of several divisions (meaning approaches and markets). The organization makes 11 dollars a minute over a year using RTH's in the markets it plays. When you look at one account in ES and do point to point trading, the account only makes 3 to 4 dollars a minute. Then you can consider the NFA amateur limits of individual person's accounts for amateurs (15). This means an amateur can make about 45 to 60 dollars a minute on the limited accounts he can trade on one exchange. Each of the 15 accounts can trade several exchanges simultaineously in each country. As a day passes, RTH's begin and end in different countries. For example South America is East of the US by half a day in RTH's terms. european Exchanges preceded both SA and the US. Asian markets cycle ahead of European markets. Roughly speaking by using Colo and having local credit based on central capitalization, you can at least triple the minutely rate of 45 to 60 dollars a minute as an amateur. All of the above only applies to intraday trading market paces which have relatively low account balances. For position trading, each account is 5 times larger And makes much less money velocity and for SSR the capital is unlimited but there is a very low money velocity ofeten meaured over weeks and months. Two line indicators work for all liquid markets. Liquidity is a minimum market requirement. Making money by monitoring and analysis is only related to the market's pace and the duration of trend segment in a given trading fractal. Basically, you only build your mind once. BUT it is also true that you have only one opportunity to build your mind. Full differentiation is only dependent on doing drills to obtain the pieces of inference. The mind does two things for you. It arranges the pieces in a logical spectrum. Then where weaknesses exist, the mind surfaces questions to be drilled upon to bring the spectrum into balance. Most people deny themselves the once in a lifetime opportunity. Their way of growing in a given convention slowly squeezes out the opportunity. On.Target is a good person to read to understand how this divorce from opportunity takes place. He avoided it by growing in one of the acceptable conventions. His organization would not be limited to 11 dollars a minute for RTH annually. If a person wishes he can marry the two line theory to "The Pattern". I use 10 to 12 leading indicators of the fractal I am trading. It is possible to invent about as many leading indicators as you wish. Markets are basically timeless. They have participant operating rules. Collectively, all the participants in a given market have this timeless participating characteristic. It fit under the heading of Human Nature. Humans have learned to harness Science to work for them and to define, intimately, the working of Nature. The markets all fit into this realm of study and examination. So the market, for me, are part of my supply chain. I simply extract the full offer of the markets continually. Anyone can look at the relationship of the market's offer and the performance of PEP, the paradigm best used, for extracting capital from their operating pools. Why doesn't betting work? It is good to know this.
Mister Jack, Could it be that when liquidity is low fractals on the different time frames start overlapping each other and FTT's evaporate ?
First, I would like to thank all of you that have pm'd me. One of the questions that gets asked is " when to cover and/or reverse?". Today, like every other day provided the answer with CDV of YM.( which as everybody knows is a leading indicator of ES). Pay particular attention to the green bookmarks on CDV.
Certainly not. My point was that it can come from real estate taxes or a number of things. In reality, the spending opportunities are greatly reduced when you owe the IRS.
That's easy. Today at precisely 13:35:17, 17 seconds into the black forming bar, PRV indicated almost 10 times the Volume that is coming in compared to the previous bar (projecting over 80K). The Price was breaking out in a "certain" way out of "certain type" of lateral formation. Anybody who was short after 12:55 and takes their cue from that ridiculous volume vs. volatility matrix that you morons are worshiping, received the signal to reverse long. Those who trade know how it would have worked out after market dropped 10 points on the next 6 bars. "Correlation does not imply causation". Read and re-read this until you get it. Hershey, spyderguru and makosqu - the holy trinity of sct, who claimed to have found the workaround, - do not trade, period. That's why Al can't see them where crayola bar drill says they would be trading. QED