My view is that the pacelines could be reduce to the 3 lines.Lower bo,middle - latteral line,and higher bo.No?
I work in a simpler manner than you. The way to divide deciles into four parts may be easy or a gueass for you but for me there was an involvement in Science. you may have missed the volatility and overlap tables. If you do the coding to adjust the region every bar, you will find it requires work. Maybe you have not seen the lines adjusting during the day>
Its a bit different what i trade.I trade from the Asian session throught the midday of the EU session.There are several markets overlapping on the way,but it doesnt hurt the pace until EU opening.With ticks display it keeps steady and i only have three lines on volume and three corresponding to volume lines on the price.
It was not studios regarding the volume lines ont the price pane(and i wanted to find out why).Are you really that dumb?
Every internal except the lateral. Both boxes are made into one bar, respectively. This means for trading, you only have translating bars. At this level of PA trading you fail to have a leading indicator, so insted of lagging, you switch to a leading indicator. By doing this, then you have advance warning from volume what is going to happen in price. Price teaches what to throw out in volume. As you would see if you had the clue to set up a screen to watch markets, All bars begin with a red box bounding them. A second bar with a red box surrounding it is thrown out. If you are an efective and efficient trader, you cut back on observations during a bar up to and including all the time that the bar is NOT important. While this is going on you sweep your eyes to follow (what the charts I used to illustrate how my eyes sweep) the values where trend segments will be ending. These are other leading indicator pics that you hang on your display. As you found out somewhere you are "detailed" oriented and you find it impossible to discover the pieces. Often you just throw them out. You were "reacting" to TO a while back. It is just an example of your detail orientation. It is rarely possible for a person to consider the views of others. I am at another pole in that spectrum of views. I deal deductively from principles. So I need to disappear for some kinds of thinkers and all non thinkers. I suggest "putting the pieces together". It is based on the assumption that a person who is "detail" oriented can easily find the pieces. That did not happen in CW or academia. The world's orientation to learning to make money is almost totally senseless. I do not see any tidal changes coming soon.