Questions about NYSE

Discussion in 'Trading' started by trader_XX, Jun 7, 2006.

  1. i wonder how come that i never had a complaint about the specialist way of doin' biz and that i always got filled on my trades and often with price improvement even when stock was skyrocketin' or fallin' like a stone, in the most volatile environments of em all...at open and on news stocks...jim can u explain how i can possibly get better treatment than u, please?
     
    #71     Jun 11, 2006
  2. Hamlet is lying. I never denied writing the text quoted by Hamlet. I instead denied Hamlet's false description of that text.

    I am sure that nobody reading this thread is interested in a dispute over who said what. Hamlet will, nevertheless, most likely continue to pursue such disputes, just as he has done in past threads. He seems incapable of anything else, and he is too selfish to realize the worthlessness and disruptive nature of his interference with otherwise valuable debates.
     
    #72     Jun 11, 2006
  3. Hamlet

    Hamlet

    Here Rockford is claiming that most successful strategies trading NYSE which do not rely on the NYSE system would be even more profitable if the specialist system were abolished.

    Of course he offers no proof of this claim, and when challenged on it he attacks the challenger as he has just done to me. I hope that others here will call him on it as well. I know that when I see such nonsense, I must call the person on it, know matter how many times he will launch a personal attack.
     
    #73     Jun 11, 2006
  4. Sure. We had different strategies, different tactics, different goals, and different personalities, so we received different quality of NYSE order execution. It is also possible that you were robbed blind by the specialists, but that you didn't know it was happening. It should be expected that different traders will be helped or hurt unequally and in different ways by a corrupt specialist system. It should also be expected that different traders will have unequal levels of awareness, when exposed to the same victimization, and even when using identical trading strategies. Unequal experiences provide no evidence by which to defend NYSE.

    Let me give an example. volente00, earlier in this thread, explained that he never had any trouble at all, in getting NYSE stock traded on Island. He gave this info, apparently as evidence against those like me, who complain that stale NYSE quotes, acting through the power bestowed upon them by the trade-thru rule, interfere with trading at other venues, like Island. It was only after some discussion and detective work that we confirmed that his experience had been limited to just one particular NYSE symbol, during a time window when Island trades on that symbol, WMT, were NOT yet governed by the trade-thru rule.

    This example provides a good illustration as to why you cannot dismiss the experiences of other traders, simply by relying solely upon your own experiences as one single trader, which won't be representative of the market as a whole.

    Please note that my own criticisms of NYSE are not based merely on my own trading experiences, but also on what other traders and experts have shared on EliteTrader and in various other fora.
     
    #74     Jun 11, 2006
  5. Are the NYSE officials, government prosecutors, and judges who nail corrupt specialists also nothing more than "bashers" and "conspiracy theorists"?

    If the specialists and exchange officials aren't conspiring, front running, breaking their own rules, stealing and cheating, then why are they constantly settling civil charges brought by the government, and why are they now even starting to plead guilty in criminal cases? Here is an example:

    http://newyork.fbi.gov/dojpressrel/pressrel06/securitiesfraud051206.pdf
     
    #75     Jun 11, 2006
  6. United States Attorney
    Southern District of New York
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
    May 12, 2006 HERBERT HADAD, MEGAN GAFFNEY
    HEATHER TASKER, BRIDGET KELLY
    PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICE
    (212) 637-2600
    TWO FORMER NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE SPECIALISTS
    PLEAD GUILTY TO FEDERAL SECURITIES FRAUD CHARGES
    MICHAEL GARCIA, the United States Attorney for the Southern
    District of New York, announced that JOSEPH BONGIORNO and PATRICK
    MCGAGH, former registered specialists on the New York Stock
    Exchange (the “NYSE”), pleaded guilty today to violating federal
    securities laws. The charges arise from the specialists’
    fraudulent and improper trading from approximately 1999 through
    early 2003.
    As charged in the Indictment, purchases and sales of
    securities on the NYSE must generally be executed through a
    specialist who works on the floor of the exchange. Each security
    listed for trading on the NYSE is assigned to a particular
    specialist and is traded through an assigned “post” on the floor
    of the exchange. Both BONGIORNO and MCGAGH acted as specialists
    at Van der Moolen Specialists USA, LLC (“VDM”) and were members
    of the management committee at VDM. During their tenure as
    specialists on the floor of the NYSE, each served as an NYSE
    floor official, responsible for supervising and regulating
    trading floor activities. BONGIORNO also served as one of twenty
    senior officials known as Floor Governors. During the relevant
    period, BONGIORNO was the specialist assigned to trade Hewlett
    Packard Co., and MCGAGH at various times was the specialist
    assigned to trade Nortel Networks Communications and Pfizer Inc..
    According to the Indictment, orders to purchase or sell
    securities are presented to a specialist in one of two ways –
    either orally and in person by a floor broker on the floor of the
    NYSE, or electronically using the NYSE’s Super Designated Order
    Turnaround System (“Super DOT”).
    2
    As explained in the Indictment, after receiving an order to
    buy or sell a security, the specialist can execute or “fill” the
    order in one of two ways. Generally, the specialist must match
    any open orders to buy from one investor with an open order to
    sell from another investor within the same price range. Orders
    executed in this manner are generally referred to as “agency”
    orders because the specialist simply acts as an agent who matches
    orders from willing buyers with willing sellers. If there is no
    matching order to buy and order to sell in the same price range
    at a given time, a specialist generally may execute an investor’s
    order to buy by selling from the specialist’s propriety account,
    or “inventory,” and may execute an order to sell by buying the
    stock for the specialist’s inventory. This method of executing
    an order is called trading on a “principal” or “dealer” basis.
    NYSE rules prohibit a specialist from buying or selling
    securities on a principal or dealer basis – in other words, by
    participating in the deal as a buyer or seller itself – if the
    specialist were aware of pending orders from investors at the
    same price.
    According to the Indictment, the defendants systematically
    violated NYSE rules and breached their duties to refrain from
    buying and selling stock for their proprietary or dealer accounts
    while in the possession of executable customer buy and sell
    orders, in furtherance of a scheme to defraud purchasers and
    sellers of stock on the NYSE. Instead, the defendants effected
    improper proprietary trades at the expense of public orders by
    one of two means. By “trading ahead” of public orders – i.e., by
    filling customer buy and sell orders through principal trades
    from their dealer accounts in front of executable customer
    orders, the defendants trade from their dealer accounts at the
    most advantageous price, and then by executed agency orders with
    which they were entrusted at a less advantageous price than they
    had received for their proprietary accounts. By
    “interpositioning” themselves between these orders - i.e., either
    purchasing stock for their proprietary accounts from customer
    sell orders, and then filling customer buy orders by selling from
    their proprietary accounts at a higher price, or selling stock
    from their proprietary accounts to fill customer buy orders, and
    then filling customer sell orders by buying for their proprietary
    accounts at a lower price. The defendants BONGIORNO and MCGAGH
    and their firm’s proprietary account profited by capturing the
    spread between the lower price at which they bought stock from
    customer sell orders and the higher price at which they sold
    stock to customer buy orders.
    3
    BONGIORNO and MCGAGH each pleaded guilty to one count of
    securities fraud in connection with their unlawful trading
    activities. At the plea hearing, the Government described the
    case as involving “securities fraud charges in an area where
    criminal charges have never before been brought” and the
    defendants’ acknowledgment of guilt as “ground-breaking.”
    According to the Indictment, illegal trading profits earned
    for VDM’s proprietary account as a result of BONGIORNO’s
    interpositioning totaled approximately $1.3 million, and customer
    harm caused as a result of BONGIORNO’s trading ahead totaled
    approximately $1.2 million.
    As a result of their guilty pleas, BONGIORNO, 51, of
    Brooklyn, New York, and MCGAGH, 40, of Little Silver, New Jersey,
    each face a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison and a maximum
    fine of $5,000,000 or twice the gross gain or loss resulting from
    the offense. The sentencings for BONGIORNO and MCGAGH are
    scheduled for August 10, 2006, at 2:00 p.m. and 3:00 p.m.,
    respectively, before United States District Judge SIDNEY H.
    STEIN.
    Mr. GARCIA praised the efforts of the Federal Bureau of
    Investigation. Mr. GARCIA also thanked the Securities and
    Exchange Commission and the NYSE for their continued assistance
    during the investigation.
    Assistant United States Attorneys LAUREN GOLDBERG and
    ANTHONY S. BARKOW are in charge of the prosecution, together with
    CHRISTOPHER M. CASTANO of the Securities and Exchange Commission,
    who was designated as a Special Assistant United States Attorney
    for purposes of this case.
    06-067 ###
     
    #76     Jun 12, 2006
  7.  
    #77     Jun 12, 2006
  8. Hamlet

    Hamlet


    Faulty logic from my friend Rockford again.

    Everyone reading knows that in any population, be it CEOs, police, doctors, lawyers, priests, schoolteachers, rabbis and even specialists that there will be some who will do wrong. This is the nature of humans and so it shall be until the end of time. Rockford keeps posting links to these old incidents all over ET. What is his point? He ignores challenges to his claims, and seeks only to obfuscate
     
    #78     Jun 12, 2006
  9. Maverick74

    Maverick74

    Jim, please go to bed. Just call it a night man. This is getting very tiresome. The specialist system is the only system in the world that I am aware of that a guy can get price improvement on a regular basis on his trades. All you have to do is learn to read the tape. I'm not saying that's easy, but it is what it is. If you don't like trading with all the corrupt traders, hedge funds, floor brokers, market makers, institutions, then go teach 3rd grade public school.
     
    #79     Jun 12, 2006
  10. thats the whole point innit..no way u can get improvement so often in any other mkt and that saves u a lot, nevermind nyse is easier to read and trends more often...i just dont get this countinous bashin of the spec. when almost of my orders routed trough smart ended up at nyse cuz there was a better price and those routed directly profited from even better improvements.
     
    #80     Jun 12, 2006