Don't mix trolling with constructive criticism, the latter is an essential part of an open discussion.
As for the first point, who'd want to read it? There are more than one journal that consist of the journalist talking to himself. No reason not to let them be. As for the second, I can't imagine why a sponsor would intrude on a thread where he's not wanted. I should think they have better things to do.
I agree. But constructive criticism must also be informed. Otherwise it's just rationalized trolling.
And my final point--Giving people who have no financial or recognizable benefit from a site, the power to determine the publicly viewed content on that site, is counterproductive to the viabilty of the site's purpose.--Thank you for your time--
You know what? I've noticed that. More so recently than ever before. Lots of journals where it's just the OP talking to themselves. I imagine that this wasn't their intention, but I think onlookers read the 'calls', see that the person doesn't have an edge (and so aren't interested as they can't learn anything) and move on. Then the journal soon dies as the OP gets bored.
If the problem is with moderation, then that needs to be fixed. If the problem is with people being overly sensitive, then they should be told as much. I don't see declaring open season as the way to deal with this.
db, as long as you allow me to make a fair point before you banish me. I honestly do try to post constructive content.
I do check in there from time to time. It's a quality thread. Do you know if ammo will return (after his boat is built?) ?
Are there actually moderators here other than the owner? Trade2win has loads of them who use their discretion to decide when someone is 'trolling'. Couldn't something as simple as that be the solution?
I'd very much appreciate your input. I've been reading your posts for quite some time and you appear to be the real deal. (If you're not, I'd rather not know)