I posted JUST THE OPPOSITE clearly telling that trader A will NEVER BE A BILLIONAIRE. To become one he should trade much bigger, much more markets... which he is not interested in. It should be clear now what the level of intelligence is on ET. ET is a waste of time.
WRONG. Trader A has an agressive strategy but limits the amount invested by resetting his account monthly to the initial invested amount. If he would start with $5000 he would empty his account every month just leaving $5000 to continue to trade. And now I am out.
Sorry too many inconsistencys, the belittling to avoid answering questions you can't ie your margin level? The suddenly surpassing 2pts per day upon realising margin requirement. Although 100%+ per week is possible, I sadly doubt your profitable at all, just a ego trip, also don't think your out to sell your services if that helps. If I'm wrong PM me a statement or 3, if they look legit I shall eat humble pie gadly.
I think you're smart enough to know you weren't going to change there opinions, that's why I bowed out as well, as I realized mine wasn't going to change nor was theres. but no need to be a **** about it. there's other people here that are successful too.
"It should be clear now what the level of intelligence is on ET. ET is a waste of time." as I posted earlier. You are one of the biggest, but not what you think. Idiot. Why should I send statements to an illiterate person that even cannot calculate?
No, if you're of superior intelligence, or even as intelligent as you're alluding too, you already know how this conversation was going to go after reading the first 5-6 pages, all I am saying is you could of bowed out more gracefully in my opinion. If you disagree thats fine, no need for personal attacks, but if you feel the need too go ahead and proceed with them.
Could we have one thread without endless "show me your pnl and account details" and "unpossible as dictated by [insert meme here]" discussions? I think most here should be mature enough to quit their BS and at least try to give a benefit of doubt, as in what's the possible harm and you might expand your perspectives or thought-processes, even if the information is inaccurate or wrong in some way? Otherwise, any sharing is pointless, as arguments can be construed against *anything*. Regarding edge: If there is edge, there can be anti-edge. If your perspective says edge is skill, call it anti-skill, but you can't have one end of a spectrum without the other. I have proof that anti-edge is real, especially in light of how much brokers charge for retail trading, but also in my own incompetence in aligning myself with the markets over so many years or even understanding the game at all. Something obviously very simple for the rest of ET. Regarding "100% per week returns": That's one metric, one perspective of the markets. I fully respect avoiding any rat-race to become billionaire, betting farm x 100 and the like, which some actually do (gambling). However, such rates are very quickly misinterpreted by others. What I do feel though, is that there's a secret to this, and maybe also a lesson in humility and choosing the middle path, for real success, a smile, not too much $$$ prospects to handle. Maybe my current belief that honesty is most important in trading (for yourself and in harmony with the world) should be replaced by humility? I try to learn. Both Ms: Thanks for real efforts to share perspectives and attitudes. Superficial criticisms should be ignored. Only our self can be the final judge.
Because if it's always 50/50 with no edge, but higher than 50/50 with edge... doesn't that equal more than 100%? Which means to get a correct balance, there would have to be something to counter balance the edge... which would be something on the opposite spectrum like you said.