Question for Grob/Hershey...

Discussion in 'Trading' started by makosgu, Sep 4, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. txuk -- just another way of saying that the ST channel FTT'd on peak volume. It was definitive so I made my comment... the trend could have ended on that earlier 3 bar tape on big volume - but it didn't. The ensuing long was a WWT.

    This is just a fact of life with this style of trading - sometimes you just have to be there and see what happens -- other times the fog lifts for a moment and it's a no-brainer.
     
    #841     Oct 6, 2005
  2. Correlation? What correlation? Do you think oil traders watch stock indices? Be careful. The non-correlation and the anti-correlation are just as important. As are the coronation and the crenellation.
     
    #842     Oct 6, 2005
  3. Pretty quiet - everyone must be sick or on vacation or both :)

    I have two alternative charts here which I'm hoping for a "which one is more correctly drawn, and why" type of answer.

    The first shows, what I think, is a FTT on bar 6, but then doesn't form a new channel.

    The second shows how I "deal" with the FTT problem from bar 6, by using a more negatively sloping channel.

    I know everyone's busy, so as always, thanks in advance for any help!

    Anthony

    edit
    The channels were drawn post hoc, with the exception of the blue lateral channel and attempted trend lines.
     
    #843     Oct 7, 2005
  4. Second chart.
     
    #844     Oct 7, 2005
  5. Youre charts look much better compressed a bit. Imo, bar 5 was the ftt. and bar 4 was a clear inidcation of what was coming.
     
    #845     Oct 7, 2005
  6. Thanks for the comments Easy.

    For clarification, do you mean that the charts should have a greater range on the scale (i.e. the bars should be smaller?) If so I'll try to remember to scale it up before I get a screenshot.

    With respect to the FTT, do you mean that the first long (green) channel, the CO channel, should have also contained bar 5? In effect, widening it out?

    Thanks for your patience :)

    Anthony
     
    #846     Oct 7, 2005
  7. No, I meant your charts look great. I think your problem arose with the ftt because you didnt draw the first channel of the am. My second channel wasnt drawn in until bar 8 or 9 so not exactly accurate.
     
    #847     Oct 7, 2005
  8. LOL, ah, ok thanks :)


    So you mean a better chart would be like this:

    (Again, drawn post hoc using your chart as a reference at times.)
     
    #848     Oct 7, 2005
  9. Bars 1...63

    Anthony
     
    #849     Oct 7, 2005
  10. The Fat Lady is warming up...

    I'm pleased to say that the last three channels or so I *actually* drew in advance.

    Anthony
     
    #850     Oct 7, 2005
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.