jack hershey, (on a technical note) before you start to advice on quant matters please learn how to post on an internet board. It is very annoying to open attachments and does not show much respect to others. Secondly (and more seriously). You are the only one on this thread not giving straight (and helpful) answers to OP. In fact you talk only about yourself - how old you are and therefore how great you must be - WTF. Seriously - who gives a shit - set up a thread for you memoirs. By the way the paper you posted really suggests you may be on drugs or something similar. From your posts it is also clear that you unlikely know much about quants. Quants are almost exclusively breed in investment banks with a minority going out of school directly to funds. Did you ever work for one of top 5 IBs? For how many years that you can advice on how quants are hired? How many quants have you hired there yourself? You say: "Look at quants and what they do. They predict and bet on the prediction. there is risk involves as I see it." WRONG - majority of quants never predict anything. Majority of quants are in derivatives. One thing I know - people of your age (and older) have usually much better class of communicating their success - in fact they do not feel they need to do it in the first place. When you started to talk about nitro and how he blew his account I lost my patience - you are a lowlife.
Some good questions where answering may help to OP as well. Unfortunately I am out on yacht for the next two days so I can answer only when I get back - sorry about that. One thing I see straight away - our wires may have got crossed with respect to how we use the word "prediction". You seem to use the verb "to predict" in similar way as "to forecast", i.e. to tell where the price is going to be in future (up/down/level) and bet money on it. In this meaning a typical quant does not predict. That's a work for analyst, research and most importantly for a trader. However quant predicts where the price should be as of now based on an expected behavior of his model. He then recalibrates either the whole model or the model's inputs to observable market prices (if available). Then the trader (may) use this model to decide on hedging for the next time step. Of course quant is also able to forecast where the price is going to be given the set of parameters but that is trivial - it would be similar to forecasting value of your book tomorrow when you are told tomorrow's settlement prices. So in the real sense quant (usually) does not forecast. I will try to explain it better later. (and disclosure: I left WallStreet some time ago so there may be some fresher insights - I am an independent trader).
Your choice of undergraduate major or double major is going to do very little to help you get a competitive position at an investment bank or hedge fund. Those firms are looking for top candidates from top graduate programs. My advice to you would be to forgo the double major entirely in favor of a single concentration, preferably in mathematics, computer science, economics, or finance. Spend the money you saved on those double major credits on your graduate degree. -segv
Leaning in a formal setting is a key opportunity in a lifetime. This formal learning in a constructive atmosphere is very forwarding. Being at query is an essential component. The OP has a lot of choices. I've seen several teenagers learn to trade and have the blessings of their parents. They had a free ride through college by paying for it out of profits. They were independent traders learning in subject levels of their choice. There were no PC's or copiers back then. Today's students have it made. They can major in anything they want and become very wealthy as amateur independent traders. Some meet their life time investment goals in their mid twenties in today markets with today's support services. A couple of young ladies are posting on a two day course they took. One of the topics is using prebreak out signals for being ready to take on a trade. Is there any other way? Well, of course, but why would a person not be using leading indicators of price?
Where is the record of the citations? These should be public records, no? OPM? Just paying it forward?
This thread was productive and [hopefully] useful before Jack showed up. Now it's just everyone arguing against Jack's very incorrect understanding of quant. I'm done.
Unfortunatly, yes everyone started to discuss jack. Instead of the original intentions. Although this was probably the most productive thread for me yet. Thanks everyone. If anyone still has anything to add please add. Although before this thread is done I am interested in complete review by dhpar, which supposably had contact w/ quants. Otherwise, everyone did help me a lot, and I mean everyone. Thanks.
Maybe they will do one of these for quants: http://spotlight.encarta.msn.com/Fe...le_TopBSchoolsforEntrepreneurs.html?GT1=10186