The problem with Puretick's signals, is they are cherry picked in the room. The good ones go in Alex's track record, and the bad ones somehow disappear by the wayside. There is NO consistency in the room, and Alex's risk management will bankrupt a newbie trader in under two months. This has been addressed by @ least 10 members here that have trialed the service. Just do a search on the many PURETICK threads. I highly recommend any newbie to take a $10 trial to PURETICK to learn what NOT to do with his money! surdo
I keep hearing people say that. However, has anyone shown actual proof (images, logs et cetera) of such signal call alterations other than taking the word of an annonymous poster. If so, can you please post the link to the data (image or log of the dissapearing trades). If not, isn't that just as bad as someone saying they are profitable without proof. For example, Brutus post daily chat logs of the #AHG room although its not a signal calling room. If someone posted a trade and then later denied such... We can look at the log for verification. Last of all, have you trialed their service and saw such trade alterations especially since you are recommending newbie traders try them ??? Mark
Mark: I saw this with my own two eyes, in the ROOM. Some trades are official, and some are not "CALLED". The good ones stay for the record, and the bad ones disappear. WHY ARE YOU questioning me, and the others that have witnessed this? If over 10 people took trials and posted their observations, dont you think just maybe their calls are cherry picked for The Puretick "Track record"? surdo
Do you have to look any further than their alleged win/loss ratio and the stops they advocate? Simple math shows that PureCrap is a scam.
According to your philosophy every interested client needs to visit Alex or any other vendor to see him live in action to do verification ? How long 1 day,2 days, 1 week ? Can he sleep with the vendor ? And that for a subscription of what ? $300 a month ? GET REAL, man. Why would I need to sit in that room for 1 month or more when it can be AUTOMATICALLY tracked by C2 ??!! Why you keep repeating that trades have to be manually inputed into a third party verification system ? IT IS NOT THE CASE with C2 , you trade your live brokerage account and trades are AUTOMATICALLY(no need to import your trades manually) send to C2 and logged
I'm not questioning it and if I came across that way...that's not my intentions. I'm just asking what's the source besides just saying I heard... However, based upon your additional info about your own personal experience of trade alterations... You've now answered my prior question. Yet, I would like to see someone document and show proof of such trade alterations. Photoshop images not acceptable as proof of trade alterations (sarcasm). Mark
Why don't Alex and Geoff have an "audited" track record? ......they are afraid the CD might skip like Fab and Rob!
I saw Alex cherry pick trades with my own two eyes, and it made me sick. At the end of the day, all of his trades were NOT in his "track record" .... PERIOD. I am not alone on this, there are several that independently commented on this practice over a year long period. surdo
One has to distinguish between opinions/feelings/fluff/etc, and facts. Some posts contain bigotory including the original poster. Below are few comments/concerns based solely on what I read in this thread. 1. The view on customer service is wrong, even if some customers would justify a special treatment (I agree with OptionCoach on this point). 2. The trading strategy is also of concern, if what Atticus wrote is an accurate representation of the facts. I have the impression that his description is correct. The risk/reward is high, and I think such approach is more appropriate to experts who know how to manage risk, and less for beginners. 3. My most important concern is related to the philosophy behind the service. It contains a major flaw. The service is within the framework of teaching/education. A true educator should have as a mission to educate a trader not just to make money, but to be the best in his field. Why not even strive to produce the best trader that ever lived? A teacher/coach who states that working for goldman for a nut, or a fraction of a nut, is an accomplishment is not fit for a true education. If I were the OP, I would strive to contribue to educate the best traders that ever lived. Why one can prove that this can be done, when it is done? Certainly not by producing a trader who would work for a goldman. One should work to produce traders who will do this: Burry the goldman in his resting place, own his jewlery, and become the king of traders that ever lived. OP: aim higher my friend. Plus you will know that Goldman truly respect you when they will offer you the nut, or many of it, just for staying home not trading, and not educating. Why? Because they would know that you can take more than those nuts from them, and probably even their whole trading business by taking the other side. I believe that the goldman is the best trader is just a myth,and is not the truth.