Psycho John Bolton says, "Attack Iran, 'Remove' its Leader"

Discussion in 'Politics' started by I.Q., Oct 1, 2007.

  1. The part that you do not understand is that while your state is hiding hundreds of nuclear warheads, Iran is asserting its national right to seek alternative energy.

    Your zionist state was/ is looking for any lament and unfounded excuse to manipulate the American public opinion through fear and intimidation to start another war against another opponent of yours.

    As you have worked the weapon of mass destruction, yellow cake, connection to Al qaeda and other lament and unfounded excuses to have the US send its children to fight your war, you are doing it again with, once again, lament and unfounded excuse.

    Which part of that do you not understand dddooo???
     
    #41     Oct 1, 2007
  2. Al-Baradei is not talking about Iran's alternative energy ambitions, he is not talking about Israel either. He is talking quite unambiguously about the fact that Iran is not in compliance with the IAEA and the UNSC. It's as simple as that and your attempts to obfuscate this fact are pathetic, ridiculous and transparent. Then again it's not the first time you are making a complete fool of yourself and I am sure it's not the last either.
     
    #42     Oct 1, 2007

  3. A good lie but nothing more dddooo!

    The 1948 "War of Independence" pitted an Israeli "David," struggling for survival and always on the defensive, against an Arab "Goliath," commanding vastly superior forces.

    In fact, "the superiority of the Jews over both the Palestinian Arabs and the invading Arab armies was never in dispute." The consensus in 1948 among both Jewish and Arab military experts as well as foreign observers was that the Zionists would certainly prevail in the event of war.

    In the first place, the Israelis "were not outnumbered." Indeed within weeks of the outbreak of hostilities, they were able to field significantly more troops than the combined Arab armies.

    Further, "The Arab states invaded Israel not as united armies determined to defeat a common enemy but as reluctant partners in an intrigue-ridden and un-coordinated coalition, whose members were motivated by mutual suspicion and mistrust." The Israelis were on the defensive only during the first month of the war. All told, they incurred most of their casualties not defending Jewish but attacking Arab settlements, not in areas within but in areas outside the UN-assigned borders.


    http://www.nimn.org/Resources/history/000054.php?section=
     
    #43     Oct 1, 2007
  4.  
    #44     Oct 1, 2007
  5. The US excels at overthrowing democractially elected leaders. History shows this.
    WHY DOES THE USA HATE DEMOCRACY?

    [​IMG]
     
    #45     Oct 2, 2007
  6. Persian Gulf states support John Bolton's position:

    USAF preparing Arab allies for Iran

    The United States Air Force (USAF) is working with military leaders from Persian Gulf states to train and prepare Arab air forces for a possible war with Iran, The Daily Telegraph reported Tuesday.

    Attendants at an air warfare conference in Washington last week were told how American air chiefs have helped to coordinate intelligence-sharing with Gulf Arab nations and organized combined exercises designed to make fighting together easier.

    Gen. Michael Mosley, USAF chief of staff, used the conference to seek closer links with allies whose support America might need if US President George W. Bush decided to bomb Iran, the paper reported.

    Pentagon air chiefs have helped set up an air warfare center in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) where Gulf nations are training their fighter pilots and America has large-scale bases. The center is modeled on the USAF warfare centre at Nellis air force base in Nevada.

    Jordan and the UAE have both taken part in combined exercises designed to make sure their air forces can fly, and fight, together and with American jets, the Telegraph reported.

    While it was unlikely that America's Gulf allies would join any US air strike against suspected nuclear targets in Iran, their co-operation might be required to allow passage of warplanes though their airspace. American defense officials were also reported to be keen that Iran's Arab neighbors prepare to deal with any Iranian attempt to target them in return.
    http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1191257210381&pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull
     
    #46     Oct 2, 2007
  7. I.Q’s preferred alternative:


    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
    #47     Oct 2, 2007
  8. How is Jerusalem post doing now adays??? Is it still owned by the scumbag Conrad Black???

    Anyway, as if any of of these Persian Gulf states have any say in what the US does in their country. Heck the US navy could fax Bahrain back to Doubya if it wanted to.

    Bottom line, no Persian gulf state or states will master enough power to convince the US to launch a war or not. Matter of fact, no other lobbying power, be it internally or externally, would be able to pressure the decision makers in the US to start a war against any country.....EXCEPT FOR ONE MASTER dddooo. And you know who that master is buddy.

    Let me elaborate further...If the Arab states mastered enough power on the US administration to start an unjust war against a sovereign nation. I would've opposed it as vigorously as I oppose you and your fascist ideology.
     
    #48     Oct 2, 2007
  9. This is not the point wael. The point is they (the Persian Gulf States) support an attack on Iranian nuclear facilities and will actively cooperate with the US if/when this attack takes place. Turkey said NO to the US during the Iraq invasion. These arab states said YES then and they are saying YES now, they are willling participants.
     
    #49     Oct 2, 2007
  10. They do not support! They know better!!! They are caught between a rock and a hard place. But fuck them...They put themselves in that position being the cowards they are.

    Turkey said no cause it has the guts to say no. Our puppet leadership cannot bite the hand that feeds them.
     
    #50     Oct 2, 2007