Prominent climate change denier now admits he was wrong

Discussion in 'Politics' started by futurecurrents, Jan 27, 2013.

  1. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    Let see what Zbigniew Jaworowski, M.D., Ph.D., D.Sc. has to say about CO2 in his article, CO2: The Greatest Scientific Scandal of Our Time
    http://www.warwickhughes.com/icecore/zjmar07.pdf
     
    #71     Jan 29, 2013
  2. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    The Great Global Warming Swindle

    <iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/YtevF4B4RtQ" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
     
    #72     Jan 29, 2013
  3. Tell me again, what's wrong with greenhouses?

    I must have missed why they are such a threat to mankind to keep your panties in a wad.
     
    #73     Jan 30, 2013
  4. Wow, we are really reaching now. More of the crap science from a denier website.

    The dude is a medical doctor, not a climatologist LOL !!!

    Zbigniew Jaworowski was chairman of the Scientific Council of the Central Laboratory for Radiological Protection in Warsaw and former chair of the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (1981–82) [2]. He was a principal investigator of three research projects of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and of four research projects of the International Atomic Energy Agency. He has held posts with the Centre d'Etude Nucleaires near Paris; the Biophysical Group of the Institute of Physics, University of Oslo; the Norwegian Polar Research Institute and the National Institute for Polar Research in Tokyo.[2][unreliable source?]

    [edit]Climate change

    Jaworowski's works on ice cores were published in Jaworowski (1994, 1992) and in reports Jaworowski (1990, 1992). Jaworowski has suggested that the long-term CO2 record is an artifact caused by the structural changes of the ice with depth and by postcoring processes.

    However, Jaworowski's views are rejected by the scientific community. Increases in CO2 and CH4 concentrations in the Vostok core are similar for the last two glacial-interglacial transitions, even though only the most recent transition is located in the brittle zone. Such evidence argues that the atmospheric trace-gas signal is not strongly affected by the presence of the brittle zone. [3] Similarly Hans Oeschger [4] states that "...Some of (Jaworowski's) statements are drastically wrong from the physical point of view".

    This page lists any peer-reviewed papers by Zbigniew Jaworowski that take a negative or explicitly doubtful position on human-caused global warming.

    There are no peer-reviewed climate papers by Zbigniew Jaworowski that meet this definition.

    whack a mole whack
     
    #74     Jan 30, 2013
  5. Ricter

    Ricter

    The ice doesn't lie, there is less today than there was a century ago. Ergo, the earth is warming.
     
    #75     Jan 30, 2013
  6. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    So anyone that does not meet your personal definition of a "climatologist", no matter how educated, is simply to be ignored and ridiculed. Even people who spent years collecting and analyzing ice core samples for major research organizations are not worthy.

    BTW - he published 17 research articles in peer-reviewed journals.
     
    #76     Jan 30, 2013

  7. Especially if other real climate scientists say his results are crap. Which they do, and they are.

    We can't even include him in the 3% of climate scientists that don't 'fully agree with the standard AGW consensus. Because he's not really a climate scientist is he?
     
    #77     Jan 30, 2013
  8. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    And AGW is being hyped by the press now.
     
    #78     Jan 30, 2013
  9. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    And all the other models?
     
    #79     Jan 30, 2013
  10. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    Really?
     
    #80     Jan 30, 2013