And 85% of these 'crazies' were university professors who were funded by the tobacco industry to produce findings that there was no conclusive evidence casually tying smoking and cancer. It was outsiders with no ties to the tobacco industry who demonstrated that there was clear evidence tying smoking and cancer... and pushed the point in front of Congress. The tobacco industry tried to discredit these people saying they were merely engineers and doctors ... not scientists.
Some more enlightening material on Professor Mann at Penn State... http://www.openmarket.org/2012/07/13/the-other-scandal-in-unhappy-valley/
And what the fuck does that have to do with the price of tea in China? How could it be that you're smart enough to fly a plane?
Tea? I thought the topic was AGW. Rectum profits from a major contributor of green house gas emissions, kinda like you only on a larger scale. Hmm...because I'm a whole lot smarter than your average heat and air installer?
And he has been cleared of all wrongdoing and data manipulation by multiple investigations. And regardless, the science does not depend on him at all. But I'm sure the Koch bros are happy to see how deluded you and your fellow deniers have gotten. They probably have donated to that website. BTW... this is news to the ignorant deniers but, the hockey stick chart is correct.
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/aGgyxRAev6g" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> <iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/-zeGY8zbzc8" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> <iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/13kRznssNCk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> <iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/sqi5BY0DLh0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> <iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/FfHW7KR33IQ" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Maybe the videos provide documentary evidence of the fraud being committing by climate change promoters. Nothing quite holds up as well as video when it comes to evidence.
No, they don't. Besides, charts are much more telling. Videos are for the lazy and those that need their opinions spoon-fed to them. Please tell me what you think this chart means and where it might be wrong. You DO know how to read a chart don't you? I'm starting to think the deniers simply don't have the brainpower to understand them. Keep in mind this data is verifiable by multiple sources. IOW it's accurate. It's not designed by commies from the UN.