Prominent climate change denier now admits he was wrong

Discussion in 'Politics' started by futurecurrents, Jan 27, 2013.

  1. Tragic isn't it, that so many people could put politics before before keeping their integrity. Guess it just shows how low we've gone over the past 40 years. When the men and women of science are just as corrupt as the politicians, you know the collapse ain't far behind.
     
    #11     Jan 28, 2013
  2. Try reading about it and then get back to us on that rather than making assumptions that fit your preconceived opinion.

    BTW, even assuming there is some coherent BE it would be a tiny tiny fraction of the power of big coal/oil.
     
    #12     Jan 28, 2013
  3. nitro

    nitro

    You should go back and study the "does smoking cause cancer" debate back in the fifties and sixties. You will find nearly identical crazies saying there was no conclusive evidence causally tying smoking and cancer.
     
    #13     Jan 28, 2013
  4. Yeah, but they are not putting politics before science. Only in your deluded mind. To assume all the world's climate experts and organizations would abdicate their professional and personal ethics to foist some sort of hoax to get the world to believe an obvious common-sense thing requires a breathtaking degree of ignorance, paranoia and delusion.
     
    #14     Jan 28, 2013
  5. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    Let's discuss Penn State Professor Mann, the man who drove the fabricated hockey stick thesis and started all this 'global warming' nonsense. He and others fabricated the East Angelia climate data and left a clear set of leaked emails demonstrating that 'global warming' is a hoax and for years they drove a complete deception.

    His abuse of climate theory has many comparing his fraud to the Jerry Sandusky case. http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/309442/football-and-hockey-mark-steyn#

    So explain to us how Professor Mann and his cronies did not completely 'abdicate their professional and personal ethics to foist some sort of hoax'? All to get more government funding.
     
    #15     Jan 28, 2013
  6. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    So one of the most respected engineers in the United States is not worth listening to because is not a 'climate scientist' funded by your tax dollars.

    I would urge you to watch all 6 videos and educate yourself. The obvious problem he brings out is that the 'data sets' "proving" global warming are totally fraudulent.
     
    #16     Jan 28, 2013
  7. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    It wouldn't be the first time.
     
    #17     Jan 28, 2013
  8. Ricter

    Ricter

    <img src="http://blurppy.files.wordpress.com/2011/05/nowandthen_glacier.jpg?w=640&h=550">
     
    #18     Jan 28, 2013
  9. Lucrum

    Lucrum




    Don't you claim to be in the oil service industry, hypocrite?
     
    #19     Jan 28, 2013
  10. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    So what do they find under the glaciers when they melt in South America and Europe. All of the villages where people lived 6000 to 14000 years ago.

    Maybe I should just post pictures of my yard in winter and summer --- it has about as much credence as pictures of a glacier taken 76 years apart from a 'climate change' perspective.

    All things go in natural cycles - like they have for thousands of years including global temperature and the melting of glaciers.
     
    #20     Jan 28, 2013