To get the naysayers to believe it works. Plus, it would be a great learning experience, I think. Noobs could ask questions and the more experienced people could answer.
Hey Prof When you have a moment, my car needs an oil change, and could you rotate the tires while you're at it? Thanks I appreciate it Steve
Iron, I don;t care who believes it works or not. They have the ability to prove it to themselves and if they don't have the where-with-all to accomplish that then . . . oh well. I'm speaking for myself but I trade for a living and my "free time" is spent on database and workspace maintenance.
Hehehe. You make your living from seminars. Any simple goodle search proves that. This guy alwYs runs from a challenge and when he post live trades does no better than chance. Come on logic step up to the plate and show something real. Not just tired old rhetoric
I've never denied I do classes but my prime source of income isn't from those classes. A google (not goodle) search can't prove anything other than give you information on "me". You are an articulate person, I've searched your posts. Why you purposely misspell words and act like you aren't familiar with the English language is ignorant. Why do you treat people like we are all stupid? You were offered to sit with someone in this thread and watch him trade live and you ran away scared from the offer. Don't try your typical misdirection here, it won't work.
I have been at one of Bill's classes. I was invited to attend for FREE!!!!!! It's clear (to me at least) that Bill does these classes because he's got a thing for teaching, not to make money.
That's what gave me the idea to suggest the screensharing conference. I mean people are already offering to help demo/teach this method live... why not do so online? It's easier than having to go meet somebody (and safer, too). I think there would be a lot of interest. I know I would join in.
The good doctor will do anything outside his ore set up environment. He willnever demo in the real world only the classroom
Hey JW Just pokin a little fun at folks. As you know I am using the core concept with my own twist on entries. So far it works for me. One comment about the labeling of highs and lows. I notice the programs by posters using Ninja. Thats nice, but I kind of like identifying and keeping track of highs and lows manually. Since I have been doing it that way, I rarely miss an entry. Thanks to Prof and to you JW for your help. Regards Steve