ProfLogic's Method

Discussion in 'Strategy Building' started by El Guapo, Nov 24, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. ammo

    ammo

    hilarious
     
    #1171     Apr 7, 2009
  2. Where are you located? I'll show you live, in person at my trading desk. Your invited to watch me trade this method all day, shit I'll even buy you lunch. If I have a losing day, I'll even buy you dinner, but if its a winning day, you'll buy mine.
    Fair enough?

     
    #1172     Apr 7, 2009
  3. Sushi

    Sushi

    no that will not work. Magic men have fooled audinces for 1000s of years. My observation of you means nothing. How about posting your trades on collective2 or another 3rd party verification service. Just 6 months or so one day is just a waste of time. Link it here. If succesful I will concide I wrong Why do you pretty chart drawers refuse this and instead need personal verification? Something smells fishy!
     
    #1173     Apr 7, 2009
  4. Whisky

    Whisky

    So... asides from the stale fishy odor and your negative waves...do you have a positive idea to contribute?. Or will I use my moderator super-powers to, once again, erase your sorry existence from the face of this section of cyber-world?.

    JW
     
    #1174     Apr 7, 2009
  5. Could you post that trade? I don't see it on my chart, at least following the ruleset.

    - palinuro
     
    #1175     Apr 7, 2009
  6. Sushi

    Sushi

    no need to delete anything. My posts are respectful and do not violate the tos. Why the resistance to back testing result posting or better yet real time results via collective2? Only one answer and that is it simply does not work
     
    #1176     Apr 7, 2009
  7. Whisky

    Whisky

    Yawn. I'm in a good mood today, or need some entertainment, I guess.
     
    #1177     Apr 7, 2009
  8. Blue_Ice

    Blue_Ice

    This is your third/fourth attempt to deviate the course of this thread. Unsuccessfully i might add.

    What's with the useless need of verification?

    The validity/efficiency/usefulness of Proflogic's method is there (by the number of people admittedly using parts/all the system on their daily trading) whether it is validated according to your "cough" "standards" "cough" or not.

    Your vigilante attitude is childish and unnecessary. If you think you're saving thousands of new traders from the villain hands of Proflogic and his method then i'd send you a medal. Problem is that real mail needs real addresses and cannot deliver to your current location in fantasy land.

    Why don't you put all posters on this thread and the whole thread on your ignore list??

    The few posters that have not included you in their ignore list already would follow suit and put your name in their ignore list as well.

    That would be a great feeling for everyone involved!!! Including you!!

    Seriously, give it a shot!!

    BI
     
    #1178     Apr 7, 2009
  9. I will respectfully answer your post even though you will not return the comments in kind.

    Posting results can be manufactured, not that they will but it is useless making the attempt.

    Backtesting is worthless for what I do . . . forward testing is more accurate but 95% of traders don't have the patience to devote the time necessary to validate this process. (Understanding this concept takes a familiarity with Constant or Capped Volume/Share bar charting that again most traders ignore or dismiss due to its seeming complexity)

    The thread proves nothing other than it takes patience, practice and focus to accomplish consistency in ANY method or system. No one it trying to set this system AHEAD of any other method. That is simply left to the individual attempting mastering it to make that determination ON THEIR OWN.

    This is a simple method but definately NOT easy. I spent 2 hours on the phone with a Tradestation programmer this morning and he told me that what I do is by far the most objective method he has ever seen in his 25 years of programming and trading. He also said, in clarifying that it was the most COMPLEX as it related to Tradestation and other charting packages because of the convoluted, subjective and discretionary way almost all charting packages are structured.

    This method is in no way even close to what Woodie does or for that matter what anyone else does. Anyone with 5 minutes of free time could compare the methods and tell that. The complexity comes from what you are familiar with and what you are unfamiliar with.

    It's us "Old Men" that have acquired the patience to figure out the consistencies of price action. It's the puppies that don't have the patience to varify that for themselves.

    Oh, lastly . . . everything in this thread is free. If you find value in it, use it in good health. If you don't find value in it, go somewhere else. No one is making you eat at a restaurant that serves food you do not like and then makes you pay for it.

    I'll respond to the other posts later but I must run out to the store for a bit.
     
    #1179     Apr 7, 2009
  10. You're wasting your time. He won't come out from behind the curtain of the internet and he doesn't want to verify this method through his own equity.

    We don't need no stickin verification . . . we are capable of proving it to ourselves. WE ROCK!
    :D
     
    #1180     Apr 7, 2009
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.