This post has reference to the following part in TradersStudio: First Part of the Set of âReview of TradersStudioâ TradersStudio Concepts Part 3 Reports relating to above: Session level report, opening range breakout.zip (in previous post) Percent margin plan, percentmarginplan.zip (in this post)
Thank you very much for your very useful reviews!! Have you tried the data? CSI and Pinnacle, which one is better?
This post has reference to the following part in TradersStudio: Second Part of the Set of âReview of TradersStudioâ Part 1 of 4 Reports relating to above is as follows: "Sample TradersStudio Stock workbook, tsstocksystemsmall.zip"
This post has reference to the following part in TradersStudio: Second Part of the Set of âReview of TradersStudioâ Part 4 of 4 Reports relating to above is as follows: "Sample for Forex, forextest.zip"
Thank you very much for your work and information, if you had not provided such a thorough review of other products I would have guessed that you were a Traders Studio employee. I wish you the best in your system development.
This post has reference to the following part in TradersStudio: Second Part of the Set of âReview of TradersStudioâ Part 2 of 4 To know more of the above, please refer to the following thread: A guide to computerized Trade Management
Regarding the data, I have used both CSI and Pinnacle data. As far as which one is better, is a debatable topic, as follows: CSI data is more complete and expensive, however its software harder to use; while Pinnacle data is cheaper, easier to use and its data is of good quality. Pinnacle resells MJK data, they package it and supply the software as about 60% of futures vendors sell MJK. They also have backup of the data source which they collect. CSI collects their own data.