Amazing xD No commissions ? Lovely equity curve ! Despite the low win rate Heard Livermore had a 60% Win rate, But the point is ... How much you make vs How much you lose Most of the traders from post #1 have low win rate + high Reward to Risk They behave like a casino. Larry Hite: There are good bets and bad ones. He focus on making +EV trade, whether he win or lose. He would rather lose a good bet than win a bad one. The worst being to lose @ a bad bet ! "I don't see market. I see Risk, Reward & Money" That's why some say trading is a number game. Because we shouldn't bother about winning or losing this trade, But we should focus on the next 100+ trades. Law of large numbers !
Of note, look at the time in trade. If the time in trade goes to longer terms, then things get more complicated. This seems like a good example of meshing time horizon and drawn down potential. Simply put, it avoids, by passes, the issue all together. Well Done!
You might cut then re-enter because the market pause. The asymmetry just resolved itself. Market found balance. But you re-enter because price, after a while, moves to continuation.
Sounds like the algorithm is pyramiding ? 50+ average Win/Loss is crazy based on the short timeframe. Are you Buying every 20 points up and Selling every 20 points down ?
No - not doing that. This is what I call my Bizarro Code. I am sure most traders have heard of AI by now. Well - I have been coding with AI - based on what I have learned - from some programming friends at Microsoft and Google. I live close to the Microsoft Main Campus - in the Seattle area and also close to a Google Campus. When I first developed my newer Algos - I actually decided NOT to use it - because the results were too good - so I kind of thought - something is wrong - LOL. One day - I took another look at the Algo - decided to try trading with it - and have been using a version ever since. I really don't want to say too much right now.