Presidential Bait and Switch

Discussion in 'Wall St. News' started by libertad, Mar 5, 2009.

  1. Quite obvious.....Thank you....

    We are just looking at the closest ones in some manner....

    Switzerland has a very competitive "individual rate"....

    .........................................................

    And you are correct.....

    If the US were to adapt Country B....

    Very few countries could compete....if any....
    .......................................................

    But the initial problem was "how to quickly create wealth....and thus US financial health....

    It will never happen through the current progressive system....

    The govt just gets bigger and bigger....taking more and more from a dwindling base....

    And what has been proposed as a recovery means ....


    Is anything but.....



    How would one like to shop at Walmart....

    And actually purchase US made goods ?
     
    #31     Mar 5, 2009
  2. anotherhawkeye....

    There is no country B - we will talk again when country B becomes successful. US is the world's greatest country - atleast 20 years ago - and it was and is still A. What you are proposing in B is nothing but an experiment - just like communism was 100 years ago. We cannot experiment our future like that and say, oops it didnt work out.


    ...............................................................

    This is a valid point....

    Now let's clarify....


    There is no Country B.

    There are many Country A types....


    The Country A's are "showing you their cards"....

    They are somewhat like Country A....and as everyone knows it is difficult to gain an edge with another Country A....by playing the same game....

    So again assume the slate was clean....

    Once upon a time there were 1,000,000 people and 100 companies....

    They had to make a choice between Country A and Country B....in order to quickly create much needed wealth because of unforeseen circumstances....

    Wealth is when an individual has ownership that has value....

    Thus which country will attract the talent and companies needed for production....

    1) Country A

    2) Country B

    Which country will end up with the highest tax take....and the most robust economy ?

    In any single incidence that you can imagine ....it is going to be Country B.....#1 being that they have the most efficient pricing capability just because of tax policies alone....

    Tax policies are accomplished with a stroke of the pen....

    So what does a country want do do ?

    Inevitably shrivel and die ?

    Or grow gangbusters like there is no tomorrow ?

    At the moment because of the lack of political will, the US politicians have elected to shrivel and die....

    This is not an experiment....

    This is not a case whereby the outcome is not clear....

    Do you want to establish more so that there is more ?

    Or do you want to lock in demise ?

    This is very very simple.....

    Albeit the "lawyers" in charge do not have a clue....

    Just the same crap....over and over again.....
     
    #32     Mar 5, 2009