Here is the story from last week Report: Securing Syrian Chemical Weapons Would Take 75,000 Ground Troops Will Russia land boots on the ground to fulfill the new mission Obama has agreed to. Does this mean the civil war in Syria is over? Does this mean the Russians finally have military in the middle east?
CNN Poll: Part of Syria strike opposition is the messenger's fault By Paul Steinhauser, CNN Political Editor updated 8:34 AM EDT, Tue September 10, 2013 Washington (CNN) -- A new national poll suggests that as President Barack Obama prepares to try to convince a skeptical American public why the U.S. should take military action against Syria, he may be partly to blame for the box he's put himself into. <B>And the poll also found that only one in five say they completely understand Obama's Syria policy.</B> http://www.cnn.com/2013/09/10/politics/obama-syria-poll/index.html?hpt=hp_t1 Apparently 1 in 5 completely understand Obama's masterplan. Such geniuses in our midst. Who ever knew?
The 1 in 5 are the Obamaphiles, like Ricter or the now deceased AK47. Folks that will answer a particular way because it's "their team" instead of what is right.
When you're losing, you go ad hominem. When you've lost, you go ad populum. But when you're desperate, you go ad pucrum.
Russian plan to turn over Syriaâs chemical weapons a delusion http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com...turn-over-syrias-chemical-weapons-a-delusion/