Maybe you should start taking a look at U.S. tariffs which are already in place prior to Trump returning to office. In regards to Canadian tariffs, you can just look at the replies to the X/Twitter postings which outline the claims are bullshiat. I provided a couple of example replies to a similar X/Twitter repost earlier today on ET.
Again, typical GWB speak: "Read the replies to X/Twitter posts as proof, but ignore the X/Twitter post I don't like". Better yet, "go read my replies I made somewhere on the ET forums (in the hundreds of daily posts I make) to see where I didn't like it there, either." Happy to debate if you've got exact numbers or sources you'd like to go through to see whether tariffs are more Canadian or US in nature (or roughly equal before the US's latest response). What I won't do is your little "wild goose chase" routine. I've given you a black eye so many times I know how you play it. Or you could just put me back on ignore where it's safer for you.
You can get exact numbers in the X/Twitter replies or by looking up the items in the tariff tables. Yet.. you will never take the time to even minimally educate yourself with the facts. It's not worth the time to provide you with the information because you will simply throw more bullshiat at the wall and ignore the factual information that was provided. The typical Tsing Tao act on ET, it has gotten old. The only black eyes you give are to yourself.
A friend of mine owned a hotel in Miami that Capone used to own. He knows a lot about Capone. We were just chatting about smuggling opportunities between Canada and US. It's going to be crazy.
Hey vets, were you fired from federal service? Well according to Trump's mouthpieces you deserve it because "you're not fit to have a job". Trump Lawyer Alina Habba Says Veterans Fired from Federal Government Are Perhaps ‘Not Fit to Have a Job" https://www.mediaite.com/trump/trum...perhaps-not-fit-to-have-a-job-at-this-moment/
I gave you multiple, official sources. You just don't like them. Whether the tariff is 80% or 100% is silly to argue over. Whether there are steep tariffs in place that Canada has over the US, the US does not have with Canada, is the entire point. But as usual, you just don't like what the information says.
Well, it depends. In the case of private industry, a company failing to turn a profit would need to trim fixed costs. Naturally, you'd go for the people adding the least amount of value (if they added value at all). This is "trimming the fat". If the business were so bad that you'd have to cut people who were valuable, that would be cutting into the muscle (which would be bad if the business ever recovered, because you wouldn't have the muscle to take advantage of it). But in the government, since profit isn't a concern, you get rid of the people who aren't adding value. Kinda like how GWB was "retired".
vets are one step above losers anyway. They risk their lives and don’t even get paid a lot. They should have used their daddy’s money to go into real estate. That’s what winners do.