President Obama vs. George Zimmerman: America Loses

Discussion in 'Politics' started by gwb-trading, Jul 12, 2013.

  1. gwb-trading


    Buried within this article outlining the potential racial violence that Obama has set in motion by taking sides in this case are some astuate observations about Trayvon Martin.

    Most people still fail to understand that Trayvon Martin was not an innocent kid out buying skittles as portrayed by many media outlets.

    "The truth is different. Martin had gone to the 7-11 to buy a cigar under the counter, which he and his friends used to fill with marijuana, called a "blunt." He bought Skittles and Arizona Watermelon Fruit Juice Cocktail to lace with codeine from cough syrup to get high with, a duggy concoction called "Lean." We know all this from his online chat with friends about blunts and Lean, testimony from his cousin to the police, and the store video camera."

    President Obama vs. George Zimmerman: America Loses
  2. Yes. Can we expect the jury to be impartial considering Obama already made his verdict very clear? Surely Obama must be investigated.

    Corrupting or Influencing a Jury.

    Any person who, directly or indirectly, corrupts, influences or attempts to corrupt or influence a jury or juror to be more favorable to the one side than to the other by promises, persuasions, entreaties, threats, letters, money, entertainment or other sinister means; or any person who employs any unfair or fraudulent practice, art or contrivance to obtain a verdict, or in any manner or way, except in open court at the trial of the cause, by the strength of the evidence, the arguments of the parties or their counsel, or the opinion or charge of the court is guilty of a crime.

    Corrupting or influencing a jury is a crime of the first degree.
  3. pspr


    Something the jury will never hear. Just like Trayvon's fights and aggressive inclinations.
  4. pspr


    Very serious problems for the Obama legacy. I don't know that any other president has weighed in on criminal trials and legal police actions like Obama has. He has interjected himself in to areas he should remain silent about. And he has used the power of his office to silence political adversaries and many of those he wishes to squash. We'll learn more about this AFTER he is out of office. That will be the Obama legacy.