Prediction: Losing election simply due to climate scepticism

Discussion in 'Politics' started by OddTrader, Dec 18, 2015.



  1. What is your fixation with the satellite data? That's something a paid shill would focus on. I didn't need to read past this first sentence.

    It's pretty clear to me that on this issue you are intellectually dishonest.......................................................................................... Ah hell, why mince words, you're a goddamn liar.
     
    #141     Jan 2, 2016
  2. Oh, got to the second sentence. Here you go from a red herring to an outright falsehood. The ocean temps ARE rising and even they weren't the fact that you can't understand how the heat content can increase without the temps going up means that you simply don't know what you are pretending to know.


     
    #142     Jan 2, 2016
  3. Third sentence, no the heat content of the oceans is NOT unimaginably large. Another very stupid thing to say. It can be determined fairly accurately.
     
    #143     Jan 2, 2016

  4. ^"But if the temperature rise in the oceans is statistically insignificant. how is it that we know all this missing heat is hiding in the oceans?"


    Because, the volume increases. But you knew that.
     
    #144     Jan 2, 2016
  5. "You do see what the problem here is don't you? CO2 content is more or less uniform over the entire globe because of atmospheric mixing. Yes it is not uniform at any one time, but observed over time it tends to be uniform. Would you agree? If you do, then you must realize that if CO2 is the dominate factor, and it is continuing to rise everywhere, as our measurements show it is, then we should see a rise in temperature over time that is approximately uniform over the entire globe. Would you agree? "


    No I don't agree. Again you display shocking levels of misunderstanding and disinformation. For one, CO2 is NOT uniform, it is higher in the NH because that is where most of the emissions are.

    For another more basic one that even the dullest of scientists understand bit apparently you can't, the oceans control the climate. So no, we should not expect even warming.

    But I like how to pretend to not know this. Some good shilling there. Bravo. Hope they are paying you well.



     
    #145     Jan 2, 2016
  6. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    #146     Jan 3, 2016
  7. Tsing Tao

    Tsing Tao

    But curiosity (and the need to parrot) got to him.

    And then two more posts (for a total of 5) to answer your one. That right there is an insight into how fraudboy thinks.
     
    #147     Jan 3, 2016
    piezoe and gwb-trading like this.
  8. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    It is all about drowning about the "deniers" with a large volume of posts from the "crusher crew". It has nothing to do with posting actual facts or politely debating the merits of information.
     
    Last edited: Jan 3, 2016
    #148     Jan 3, 2016
    Tsing Tao and piezoe like this.

  9. Ask me if I give a shit. Go ahead. Shouldn't you be playing with your guns?

    Oh and liehole likes your post but can't respond to my destruction of his obvious lies. He never responds after I show his statements to be lies. He will now post some other huge pile of bullshit.

    That's exactly what his handlers have told him to do.
     
    #149     Jan 3, 2016

  10. Yes, liars and fools should be called out, drowned out and insulted. Dickhead. lol
     
    #150     Jan 3, 2016