Predicting is ***Unavoidable***

Discussion in 'Strategy Building' started by aeliodon, Mar 5, 2007.

  1. LOL ... it could have been predicted when Jack turned up for the second post that this thread would unavoidably become a shit-fight. Entertainment rules !!!


    Predicting is ***Unavoidable*** :)


    -------------------
    The things people believe in are usually just what they instinctively feel is right; the justifications and arguments are the least important part of the belief. That's why you can win the argument, prove them wrong, and still they believe what they did in the first place. You've attacked the wrong thing.
    So what do you do? Agree to disagree. Or fight. - C. Zakalwe.
     
    #121     Mar 12, 2007
  2. I anticipated the same result. :D :D

    - Spydertrader
     
    #122     Mar 12, 2007
  3. rotflmao ... such fun :)
     
    #123     Mar 12, 2007
  4. wanker.

    :p
     
    #124     Mar 12, 2007
  5. Looking in that one point mirror again I see.
     
    #125     Mar 12, 2007
  6. HAHA HA HA AHA. So where were you at the trading expo when worden and his crew plugged in the "VALID" use of the indicators and got a +200% annualized return on the backtest???

    So unfortunately for you, somewhere along the lines you missed the precursors to something changing direction (ie. second derivative crossing over zero, first derivative crossing over zero, and then original function hitting a critical point). This is anticipatory stuff I learned in high school as unfailing precursors to your primary function hitting a "local extrema". Give up, you don't know what you're talking about. Easyrider posted his $200K 2 year FORWARD TEST using stoch and macd (ie. rockets)? Why didn't you accept those results? It's clear you have a bone to pick... Let's see your contrabution to ET as opposed to your detraction...
     
    #126     Mar 12, 2007
  7. ^^^^^^

    ^^^^^^

    Its curious that you always reference someone else's success with respect to JH's theories. Where is the reference to your success? I deam that you seam to be a poseur. (ivy league spelling lol)
     
    #127     Mar 12, 2007

  8. what you are missing is its never in the NOW. its always in the past, the entry is what makes it in the NOW. the very nature of the data makes it in the past. any other view is simply delusional.

    surf
     
    #128     Mar 12, 2007
  9. I don't feed trolls. Well, I did once. I have nothing to prove here, just an effort to make good on what was laid out in front of me. If his is unbelievable, then I would be an outlier among outliers... Since I don't consider anything I do to be predicting, we already established they I don't speak the same language. Do you know how many sigmas it takes to technically be an outlier??? What about an outlier among outliers? HAHA... HA HA... AHA...
     
    #129     Mar 12, 2007
  10. Three years old? The post I linked to (where Jack says: "I do use the stochastic abou five different ways....") is three MONTHS old.

    And the link I provided to YOUR post mentioning "The Stochastic Indicator" as background material is 2 1/2 MONTHS old and in your CURRENT journal.

    Are you counting on the noobs to get lost in your lies?
     
    #130     Mar 12, 2007