Algebraic Geometry Hermitian http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermitian_matrix Holomorphic http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holomorphic Deligne http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deligne Cohomology http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cohomology If you're new to trading then the first thing you'll learn is that knowing the terminology is what seperates you from people in the know... Like anything is... You could spend countless hours trying to decipher what a single phrase is suppose to mean, but may not realize that if you break it down... Understanding the concept isn't all that difficult. The phrase above included...rather than think about what a PHD level paper has to say about it. With its Riemann surfaces, manifolds, conjectures etc... Think more about the words you're reading.... Hermitian: Think in terms of AB=BA or AB=Tanh(AB) and so on... Hollomorphic: One over the other...as in... -----------11 -------7 -----5 ---3 --2 If you haven't figured it out...you can think of this in terms of time frames Deligne: One over the other has different weights associated with it to value it's importance in data modeling...as in -----------*0.39285714+ -------*0.25+ -----*0.17857142+ ---*0.10714285+ -- * 0.0714285 = ~1 "PRECISION" Cohomology: The math behind joining these groups together ----------- ------- ----- --- -- Now this was very obviously put in very simple terms...It can get far more complicated, but please keep in mind we're not trying to perform rocket science here...at least not yet.... Were trying to model data in a stable way so that our signal will be doing what the market does as things happen... Have to get something to eat... be back shortly
Interesting little diagram...Was this part of something you've been teaching before or are you trying to help clarify further the principles?.. I really made the explanation simple so the topic could be grasped first.
I have always used this stuff. It was just an interesting parallel, I guess. The window was part of scoring and the "sweeps Chart" as been done many times. The static orientation you have is not my orientation and it is just a difference. You probably aren't non probabilistic either. I certainly won't be doing any posts as being argumentative or knocking anything. It is fun to see the contrast and yields of various methods. Most of ET doesn't trade and those that do probably are in the very low yield category for loads of reasons. There is a lot of flak around here. I can understand your comments. I apologize for the intrusion.
No...no.. you're more than welcome to comment anytime... I appreciate anyone with a strong mathematics background...I actually have used both static and non-static versions of this myself with probabilistic and non probabilistic variants as well. The overall toplogy is obvously the most important concept, but if you're new to this you'd have to start somewhere. I'd have to agree about the ET traders here...I see most of them are just trading flames back and forth
Thank you for the intellectual conversation...I see where you're coming from now...When I was speaking of creating a signal, that was indeed, very simplified...I really hadn't left the topology part yet because that was still the focus...I just wanted others to understand the stateflow.