You might have something there. Aliens are most likely Asians from the future. Probably Chinese. So it would make sense they would come back in time to help out with the election of Biden. Because maybe, just maybe..... Trump did win the 2020 election and it screwed up the time line.
I don't know who you were responding to but you're correct. If something does not exist, you can not prove it doesn't exist! But while we are on this subject, let's discuss something related; it is how you can tell that you're being fed lies. You seem like a good person at heart, and so I hate to see you taken in by fools such as BUY1 and others here. You may know this, but it is not a good idea to lie to a federal judge. If found out, they can "throw the book at you," and I suppose some might literally throw something at you. If you are an attorney and the judge discovers you are lying to them, they might jail you on the spot. It's quite possible that you could end-up being disbarred over such an incident. Attorneys all know this. When they get into court, they can occlude truth and prevaricate , but if they have any common sense at all, they will never lie to a judge. You've been told that many more absentee ballots were received in Pennsylvania than were mailed out. If this is verifiable, and the attorneys for Trump pointed this out to the judge in District Court, then once verified, the judge, any judge, would have stayed the certification of the election results pending investigation. Those judges that Trump's lawyers have come before are of wide-ranging political stripes from right-wing to left-wing, and every wing in between. So the question I ask you now -- it's a trick question -- is when confronted with this startling "fact" that vastly more absentee ballots were received than were mailed out, why didn't the Judge stay the certification in Pennsylvania? There is a simple answer. Trump's attorneys know there were fewer, not more, ballots returned than mailed out. There always is! Those attorneys were not about to risk their livelihood by lying to a Federal Judge, not even for the cult leader and gangster in chief, Donald Trump. The story the judges hear is completely different from the one you read on ET, posted by god knows who, or the one on Breitbart or Zero Hedge, or the one on twitter or facebook! You can lie with impunity (for the most part anyway) in the social media and you can get by with unsavory innuendo in the commercial press and official news media, but woe unto him that lies to a Judge! There are hundreds of people involved in carrying out an election in a State such as Pennsylvania. It is extremely easy to know how many ballots were mailed out, the clerks keeps track of that sort of thing, and there is way more than one person handling the mailout. which occurs in county seats all over Pennsylvania. The "scantron" readout will tell them precisely, down to the last ballot, exactly how many were mailed back. The internet lie that many more ballot were received than mailed out can be confirmed or proven wrong in a matter of hours. Someone who believes this story about the ballots is, in effect, basing their belief on the success of a monstrous conspiracy involving hundreds of machines and many hundreds of people whose political ideologies cover the spectrum. The probability of such a conspiracy is finite, but it's some substantial negative power of ten! Do not let yourself be lied to by Trump and his followers. They come only in two stripes, either innocent and naive, or smart and dangerous.
Isn’t that exactly what happened? Pennsylvania judge halts election certification amid mail-in vote fight https://www.foxnews.com/politics/pe...s-election-certification-mail-in-vote-lawsuit
No. Entirely different issue. My post was about a hypothetical case based on a social media lie that will never be brought to court, and why. . I was explaining why the story going around that many more ballots were returned than mailed out is obviously false, because if it weren't the plaintiffs would have easily got the court to stay certification. But it's a lie. Such a case never went to Court. Trump's attorneys won't openly lie in court, they tell us one thing and the judge quite another thing. No lying by attorneys this time around either in the case above , just bad lawyering. It was a suit brought on a State Constitutional issue. Trump's lawyers alleged that the PA Constitution did not allow some who were mailed ballots to vote absentee. This despite specific PA statutory law. It went quickly to the State Appeals Court The Commonwealth Court. Hearing scheduled for Friday. This involves down ballot races. But if the Appeals Court were to rule in favor of the plaintiff it would create a tenesmal situation with regard to the already certified presidential race. Certification of the Presidential race unaffected. Republican fools appealed another related case to the U.S. Supreme Court, on grounds that, if prior suits are any guide, may tax our imaginations. That case had something to do with PA allowing ballots postmarked by Nov. 3 to be counted even if they arrived a few days late. The High Court wisely refused to get involved in that one.. "No, Virginia," Louis DeJoy* may not disenfranchise you by way of lousy mail service. ________________ *A a silly Anglicization of the French name Déjoie, because it's phonically wrong.
Things are finally heating up in PA, a state that Biden is officially about 70,000 votes ahead. This begs the question: If there are hundreds of thousands of “Votes” that involved election fraud for the benefit of Biden, in a state he officially is ahead by about 70,000 votes, does it suggest the possibility Trump actually won the US 2020 Presidental election in a Reagan like landslide? A couple of sources for recent developments for PA: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/v...70000_votes_for_biden_and_3200_for_trump.html https://www.wfmz.com/news/area/penn...cle_0c1b8220-2f65-11eb-a152-aff5e17df758.html From a former history professor and prominent Republican politician, Newt Gingrich: https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_a...t-sloppy_3592153.html?v=ul?utm_source=partner There is more going on than just PA: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...-ballot-evidence-could-overturn-nevada-result https://justthenews.com/politics-po...fficials-alleging-massive-scheme-rig-election If there is massive election fraud and it is allowed to go unchallenged, Democracy in the United States ends upon the swearing in of a illegitimate President. We will never have legitimate elections again and any opposing political party will be effectively disbanded, similar to what happened in Nazi Germany leading to and through the end of WWII, except there, opposing political parties were made illegal and people were killed for making statements against Nazism. Look at what has happened in the US recently so far: We have seem media propaganda that basically says election fraud is not possible, their have been veiled and not so veiled threats against attorneys and other outspoken supporters of the Trump Administration, and election laws were violated or selectively enforced for partisan advantages by the Democrat Party. The preceeding has been established. The question is why would the media and the Democrats take this route if they really believed election fraud was not possible? Why wouldn’t Democrats be willing to provide election transparency and allowing sworn testimony by corroborating witnesses to be heard in an open court if they did not fear election fraud woukd be uncovered? When Benjamin Franklin was asked after a session of the Constitutional Convention, ""What kind of a government have you given us?"" he replied, ""A democracy, if you can keep it."" Our republic is founded on the principle that it will continue only as long as the people keep democracy alive.
Here is the information you’ve requested: (Edit) This is for GA, but likely similar to other pending cases in other Swing States). IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICCT COURT, NORTHERN DISTRCOICT OF GEORGIA, ATLANTA DIVISION CORECO JA’QAN PEARSON, VIKKI TOWNSEND CONSIGLIO, GLORIA KAY GODWIN, JAMES KENNETH CARROLL, , CAROLYN HALL FISHER, CATHLEEN ALSTON LATHAM, and BRIAN JAY VAN GUNDY, Plaintiffs. v. BRIAN KEMP, in his official capacity as Governor of Georgia, BRAD RAFFENSPERGER, in his official capacity as Secretary of State and Chair of the Georgia State Election Board, DAVID J. WORLEY, in his official capacity as a member of the Georgia State Election Board, REBECCA N.SULLIVAN, in her official capacity as a member of the Georgia State Election Board, MATTHEW MASHBURN, in his official capacity as a member of the Georgia State Election Board, and ANH LE, in her official capacity as a member of the Georgia State Election Board, Defendants. COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY, EMERGENCY, AND PERMANENT INJUNCTIVE RELIEF CASE NO. 1 NATURE OF THE ACTION This civil action brings to light a massive election fraud, multiple violations of Georgia laws, including O.C.G.A. §§ 21-2-30(d), 21-2-31, 21-2- 33.1 and §21-2-522, and multiple Constitutional violations, as shown by fact witnesses to specific incidents, multiple expert witnesses and the sheer mathematical impossibilities found in the Georgia 2020 General Election.1 1. As a civil action, the plaintiff’s burden of proof is a “preponderance of the evidence” to show, as the Georgia Supreme Court has made clear that, “ was not incumbent upon [Plaintiff] to show how the [] voters would have voted if their [absentee] ballots had been regular. [Plaintiff] only had to show that there were enough irregular ballots to place in doubt the result.” Mead v. Sheffield, 278 Ga. 268, 272, 601 S.E.2d 99, 102 (2004) (citing Howell v. Fears, 275 Ga. 627, 571 S.E.2d 392 (2002). Due to space limitations, I left out the other 209 complaints/evidence of election fraud. The link to the entire complaint is at the bottom of this post. 1 The same pattern of election fraud and voter fraud writ large occurred in all the swing states with only minor variations, see expert reports, regarding Michigan, Pennsylvania, Arizona and Wisconsin. (See William M. Briggs Decl., attached here to as Exh. 1, Report with Attachment). Indeed, we believe that in Arizona at least 35,000 votes were illegally added to Mr. Biden’s vote count. 211. For these reasons, Plaintiff asks this Court to enter a judgment in their favor and provide the following emergency relief: 1. An order directing Governor Kemp, Secretary Raffensperger and the Georgia State Board of Elections to de-certify the election results; 2. An order enjoining Governor Kemp from transmitting the currently certified election results to the Electoral College; 3. An order requiring Governor Kemp to transmit certified election results that state that President Donald Trump is the winner of the election; 100 4. An immediate order to impound all the voting machines and software in Georgia for expert inspection by the Plaintiffs. 5. An order that no votes received or tabulated by machines that were not certified as required by federal and state law be counted. 6. A declaratory judgment declaring that Georgia Secretary of State Rule 183-1-14-0.9-.15 violates the Electors and Elections Clause, U.S. CONST. art. I, § 4; 7. A declaratory judgment declaring that Georgia’s failed system of signature verification violates the Electors and Elections Clause by working a de facto abolition of the signature verification requirement; 8. A declaratory judgment declaring that current certified election results violates the Due Process Clause, U.S. CONST. Amend. XIV; 9. A declaratory judgment declaring that mail-in and absentee ballot fraud must be remedied with a Full Manual Recount or statistically valid sampling that properly verifies the signatures on absentee ballot envelopes and that invalidates the certified results if the recount or sampling analysis shows a sufficient number of ineligible absentee ballots were counted; 101 10. An emergency declaratory judgment that voting machines be Seized and Impounded immediately for a forensic audit—by plaintiffs’ expects; 11. A declaratory judgment declaring absentee ballot fraud occurred in violation of Constitutional rights, Election laws and under state law; 12. A permanent injunction prohibiting the Governor and Secretary of State from transmitting the currently certified results to the Electoral College based on the overwhelming evidence of election tampering; 13. Immediate production of 36 hours of security camera recording of all rooms used in the voting process at State Farm Arena in Fulton County, GA from 12:00am to 3:00am until 6:00pm on November 3. 14. Plaintiffs further request the Court grant such other relief as is just and proper, including but not limited to, the costs of this action and their reasonable attorney fees and expenses pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1988. Respectfully submitted, this 25th day of November, 2020. 102 CALDWELL, PROPST & DELOACH, LLP https://justthenews.com/sites/default/files/2020-11/COMPLAINT-CJ-PEARSON-V.-KEMP-11.25.2020.pdf
Lets just sum up the state of American politics cat vibing to street drummer (remix) ft. Donald Trump and Joe Biden - YouTube