I pointed out some flaws in his Math but he preferred a two hour drive to hash out conspiracy theories with some Republicans. These kind of guys are going to destroy their lives if they continue to pursue these mindless idiotic projects. But that's this site though isn't it. We have a trucker trying to teach us Math and a guy with a B. of Arts lecturing us on Covid statistics all year. Neither would be invited to a job interview involving data analysis.
That is the point. The numbers not adding up is suggestive of voting irregularities that could include election fraud.
For the rest of us, not for you, the numbers do add up. But if you don't understand how percents depend not only on the numerator, but also the denominator, I understand how confusing such election results might seem. It's OK though, just rely on the rest of us. If something is amiss, we will let you know.
Are you trying to save face because my questions were too difficult for you to answer? The ultimate outcome of the election will hopefully be based upon compliance with established election laws. If compliance with election laws, or more exacly, our Constitution, require the involvement of the US Supreme Court, then so be it. It is increasingly looking like there was a coordinated attempt to steal the election from Trump. Time will tell the extent of election fraud, if any, as the Trump Administration escalates it’s rights of appeals.
Giuliani, Trump Pull Off 'One Hell Of A Hearing' On Pennsylvania Election Fraud Update (1747ET): With the hearing concluded, people are commenting on how credible and well spoken the witnesses were in describing election fraud in Pennsylvania. https://www.zerohedge.com/political...re-giuliani-hold-public-hearing-2020-election
I trust my numbers for reasons as stated in post one of this thread. However, if the testimony of an elections expert and other witnesses are heard in open court and they maintain their credibility after cross examination and involving a significant number of votes, the Biden Campaign will have a problem. Perhaps this is why no lower court wants to allow actual evidence to be presented. Again, we have seen judges in PA rule on a case before expert testimony was heard. The US Supreme Court will have an opportunity to make our Consitution whole again. After all, that is what they are there for, right?
Finally, a judge that will be fair and enforce the law. That is a start. They can elevate this to the US Supreme Court for a final ruling. https://www.breitbart.com/2020-elec...ification-pending-republican-legal-challenge/
There was no actual evidence to present. Nothing stops a plaintiff from presenting actual evidence. Let's get to the bottom of this and stop all of this mental masturbation: @BeautifulStranger Link us to the court documents/transcripts that support your claim.