Yes, we still have SCOTUS and unanswered questions. Here are a few: PA election officials apparently violated the law by inspecting mail in ballots before election day without independent observers present: https://amgreatness.com/2020/11/22/something-rotten-in-pennsylvania/ Where is the transparency? Oh that’s right, “It’s redundant”: https://www.inquirer.com/politics/e...-gop-legislature-kathy-boockvar-20201123.html A battle over signature matching may be brewing: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/perdue-loeffler-back-trump-call-for-georgia-recount Trump continues the battle while some in the media suggest criminal penalties for those who are asking for answers to legitimate election concerns and lack of transparency: https://www.theepochtimes.com/repub...-election-challenges-in-4-states_3590754.html
If courts are doing their jobs with no bias, then PA, MI, WI, GA at the very least will have remedies directed towards their elections. Rudy, Lin and Sidney need fair hearings.
Yeah, so what do you "get" from that? A possible setback for pro-choicers, which is an issue you don't give a rat's ass about, truly. Tighter restrictions on workers organizing, and more power to the owners of capital, an issue which you, a trucker, a worker, should very much care about? You've been duped into aligning yourself with Capital by accepting the irrelevant divisions within Labor. Well done, you've made us all weaker.
I am talking about the idea SCOTUS might rule on a(an) lower court decision(s) regarding an election related issue.
Why would the Supreme Court be interested in any of your "Election Fraud" bs ? As I told you before, there was no election fraud, and that would make finding evidence of such rather difficult. You have no evidence, just a pack of rabid conspiracy theorists.
Interesting you continue on denying all the irregularities that indicate possible election fraud. Have you read any of the articles in this thread? Have you even attempted to reconcile the many issues I and others have posted? For all the times you and others, other than some of El OchoCinco’s posts, have posted in this thread, you have not even tried to address the issues directly. This “Stance” is nearly uniform of all the posters supporting the “Anti-transparency of Election” movement, suggesting well co-ordinated efforts. The implications of this “Coordination”, if true, are far reaching. Not before you try to shift the goal posts again with “We don’t have to prove anything”, I will point out the inherent hypocracy of that position given all the issues that have been contested between Left and Right over the years where discussion of the validity of the evidence did take place, as in the Steele Dossier and others, was robust. The fact is whether you, other posters, the media, or the Democrat Party wish to discuss the evidence and lack of transparency regarding the 2020 Presidential election, odds are the Supreme Court will review the appeals of the Trump campaign and may decide to hear their case, possibility resulting in favorable ruling. How far reaching this ruling might be, who knows. If Biden ultimately is sworn in without the stated issues regarding the election being addressed, half the country will likely consider his presidency as illegitimate. This obvious assessment has to be seen by the Democrats. All the election officials and the media have to do is to credibly explain the causes behind the issues and that these issues did not affect the outcome of the elections. If they can. At this point, it is looking like Democrat and media efforts are centered at denying the possibility that election fraud exists and employing intimidation tactics against attorneys, outspoken pro-election transparency advocates such as actress Gina Carano, and suggested criminal penalties for those demanding transparency by prominent media anchor, Rachel Maddow. Who resorts to these kinds of tactics? Those with a consciouness of guilt or who are afraid of something, perhaps?
That's a lot of words without much attachment to reality. No evidence, no Supreme Court case, no more Trump.
A number of irregularities went to Court and all of them were rejected. What is important is that irregularities are proven in Court. The fact that you THINK there were irregularities is irrelevant, as well as the fact that I think there were NO irregularities. To avoid this kind of discussions courts and judges were invented. And they clearly rejected ALL claims, mostly because no proof at all was presented to Court. Nobody has to proof you anything, all proof was handed over to the Court, and the Court did the rest. That's why courts were created. To avoid these yes/no discussions. It is funny how you always speak about the Supreme Court, but never mention the judgments from lower Courts as they are all detremental for your case. I suppose that if later the Supreme Court would judge againts you, you will not accept that judgement too. Only Courts that judge in favor of Trump are considered as reliable and correct by the Republicans. The possibility that the Supreme Court will judge a favorable ruling is close to zero. Trump is over and out. He even left during the G-20 meeting to play golf. Is that normal for a President? I hope that the Republican party will kick out Trump for their own sake. If Trump would go for 2024 elections again it will be detremental for the Republican party. Especially because Trump is now showing totally irresponsible behavior. He plays golf all the time, doesn't care about Covid, does not go to G-20 meeting, hides in the White House and thinks how he can cause as much damage as possible. And the Republican party accepts all this. Unbelievable.
There is no Trump 2024. Trump was beginning to feel like he was old news as it was, in my opinion, anyway. My opinions are sound. I am not tied to a particular political ideology and I am willing to consider new information as it comes available. On that note, is my information dated there are election related cases destined to go to the Supreme Court? You may want to act like a lower court is the last word because you may like the outcome, even if it may have been partisan, but since when have Democrats stopped at a lower court when seeking justice? Remember Roe versus Wade? Was there something about a lower court’s ruling Democrats did not like? Hypocrisy, anyone? Unless Trump has conceded the election to Biden and has withdrawn his lawsuits, we should be hearing from the Supreme Court soon. As it should be.