Sanders predicted how Trump could attempt to use this to his advantage: "It could well be that at 10 o’clock on election night, Trump is winning in Michigan, he’s winning in Pennsylvania, he’s winning in Wisconsin, and he gets on the television and he says, ‘Thank you, Americans, for reelecting me. It’s all over. Have a good day.’ But then, the next day, and the day following, all of those mail-in ballots start getting counted, and it turns out that Biden has won those states, at which point Trump says, ‘See? I told you the whole thing was fraudulent. I told you those mail-in ballots were crooked. And we’re not going to leave office.’ So that is a worry that I and a lot of people have."
Division has been coming from both sides, but mostly from Trump ... Answer: Because the people are rejecting your brand of divisiveness.
To my everlasting dismay I do not see how you Trump fanboys don't see his authoritarianism as the biggest threat to American exceptionalism that has existed since the civil war. Anyway, it doesn't matter. Trump has lost and the game will soon be over for him and his family.
I'm not a Trump fanboy. I am a Pro-American. --Trump a threat to the country? Yeah----no.----Rather, Trump has saved and turned the country around.
They haven't even got through counting yet, no clear winner, and losers like you and Trump himself are whining about "fraud". It's been known all along the tendency for more Democratic voters to vote by mail and Republicans on the day. So without inside knowledge of the order votes were collected and counted, the final tally you cannot know. You haven't even lost yet and you are a poor loser. It does however look like the most likely result now is a razor thin win for Biden. It's dicey right now but if the majority of uncounted votes are Democrat, as was expected pre-election, he'll hold his leads. Too close to call, and ridiculous to call fraud they are doing their best to get this done in a pandemic.
Gerrymandering is on both sides. Yes, I am for creating geographical based voting precincts that are based upon physical barriers and simple geometric shapes. How about the idea that reponsible citizens or even felons who have fulfilled their debt to society, including the period they are on parole, respresent the rest of us? You’ll need to find a way to justify that. Some voting lists include people that have been dead for decades. Since a source of voter fraud has involved dead people, why wouldn’t we reduce that risk? It is because dead people only vote Democrat, perhaps? I’m for unified voting registration requirements which meet common sense laws that maintain the integrity of our voting process. Any suspicious activity, anomalies, or evidence of election fraud should be investigated immediately and criminals punished appropriately. Further, by default, investigations should involve administrative personnel if an election worker is initiately a target of an investigation. Interesting statement of yours considering that you admitted that convicted felons should vote and that they vote Democrat. You might want to work on that a bit. Nevertheless, we should put stringent measures in place to reduce all voting fraud, whether it is by Republicans, Democrats, Socialists, or another political party.