Signature verification is a fundamental process of validating the vote, especially when there are unexplained descrepancies in allocation of votes during the update process.
We all lose when the system turns into Venezuela and the ruling pedophile traitors are protected at all costs.
Signature Verification is being handled completely properly in Georgia. What aspersions Trump is throwing on their process is complete nonsense. -- as outlined by the courts. Attacking the Republicans officials who have spent years trying to suppress the Democratic turnout and vote in the state is not going to help Trump out.
You just don't get it; Trump's making up a lot of shit. They are HAND COUNTING all of Georgia and that result will be very telling about so called "election fraud" and proof of concept of the methods used in the election. You know what is a really, really good audit of a computer system ? Back to basics do it all manually or in disparate pieces check the final numbers against the automated system ( I have extensive systems development experience; I found serious flaws in one client's system that they believed was flawless ). You are completely lost in delusion. Trump's team lost every case except one involving the admissibility of 560 ballots in Penn afaik. One of his legal firms has quit because they just can't be part of this sham of an attack on the US election system anymore. Basically the only people on board are the kind of "yes men", useful idiots, and people in it for extra money or power that Trump attracts. You have a world of excuses for why real world events don't match your theories. Funny how that is working out. You seem to believe the absence of fraud found is a function of the expertise of the people looking for it. Very strange theory you have. But aren't you a trucker or something similar ? If so, you have no real expertise in data analysis ( I do ). That would be like poster Jem offering up data analysis or medical advice concerning Covid. Oh wait ...
So you are claiming that the same election process that elected Trump basically by 81,000 votes and George W., by less then 600 votes is suddenly systematically unreliable ? Every head of the election counting process in every state of the US has said publicly that the election went well without any significant issues. And now significant legal experts are telling Barr and others there is no legit basis for any of these "election fraud" law suits. I suppose you believe the failure to find Big Foot or the Loch Ness Monster is due to the incompetence of people looking for them. And that we'll never know unless they are found. Fraud is something that is discovered not something you speculate on in advance based on nothing then used as a tactic to try to overturn a loss. Congrats on joining the "Covid Denier" team on a common project you can work together on. Maybe you can have Zoom meetings with "Hotcakes", "Buy1Sell2", and "Fortune Teller" and discuss all this "Election Fraud". Because that's the company you are keeping on this.
Tucker Carlson made an oopsie.... no fraud..just mentally challenged theories.. https://thehill-com.cdn.ampproject....sues-on-air-apology-over-georgia-voter-claims
For all these words, you still have not addressed how Biden, and only Biden, received more votes than cast in several swing states as shown by several incremental election updates during the latter part of the evening when Trump was beginning to look like he was running away with the election like in 2016. I refer to post one of this thread where I document these descrepancies. Since then, it has come out there have been copious failures of audit trails concerning electronic voting in certain elections. Further, an electronic voting expert outlined and categorized various fraud types and showed how an entity associated with the DNC had access to the electronic voting system, which in of itself was not illegal, but was suggested that heavy access by the DNC was used to game the system. Additionally, the update amounts seemed to dramatically change after a large number of biden only votes updated in multiple states at similar times, but especially so in Wisconsin. Compounding evidence of election fraud further still are the sheer number of electronic voting system updates that could only possibly done by an automated computer program. For more information on this, i refer to a video where a electronic voting system expert is interviewed: https://www.elitetrader.com/et/threads/voting-machine-election-fraud-smoking-gun.352388/ Further, I discussed my concerns about potential indications of election fraud in the Presidential 2020 elections with Congressman Pete Sessions’s data analyst who made similar observations to what is now known publically and is partially outlined in the linked post containing the video above. Care to use your data analyst skills on the information contained in the video? Although you will not answer the above concerns, as shown by your prior action, the fact remains they are valid indications of election fraud until they are seriously addressed. Unless Republicans, including Barr, have made a deal with Democrats to oust Trump, chances are high, a court will decide in favor in the plaintiffs and order appropriate remedies to be applied, even if they don’t call it election fraud. Do you feel Democrats are justified in cheating in the 2020 Presidential elections in order to get rid of Trump?
If you see evidence of a crime, it does not mean a crime has actually been committed, but it can be a reason to investigate; a probable cause to believe a crime has been committed. There are massive amounts of evidence that material election fraud has taken place. While the Republicans may choose to focus on “Material election irregularities” in order to obtain a court ruling for timely relief, the multiple indications of election fraud will remain until they are specifically addressed. It may turn out that electronic voting reforms as well as other reforms are passed after the contested election ends, but the 2020 Presidential election may remain tainted in many people’s minds for generations to come. For all the negative press and polling numbers Trump has received throughout his presidency, Trump still achieved more votes than in 2016 by a large margin in spite of indications of election fraud in favor of Biden. The general election polls were off about 400 basis points in my estimation, although I did read an article on realclearpolitics.com that polls were off by 600 basis point against Trump on average. The Democrat Party, the media, pollsters, biased “Fact checking” organization(s) with ties to media companies controlled by Democrats, and technology companies such as Twitter and Google have appeared to be involved in a sustained and coordinated effort to influence voters in their choice for leadership for US President, against Trump. Perhaps you are a victim of the massive effort of US media in influencing public opinions. For example, what is your opinion on the credibility of the US media? Are you comfortable with the idea the US media can effectively decide who leads the free world? I, for one of 75,000,000 informed Americans vote support Trump for his efforts at improving or at least maintaining US standing on the world stage as well as maintaining our way of life. Democrat supported riots and Communism are contrary to our interests as a people and our country. If you really think about it, who would vote for that? Apparently, not enough, hence the apparent indications of election fraud followed up by a huge propaganda campaign attempting to undermine the credibility of challenging apparently compromised elections in various states. In spite of all this effort of influencing the elections in the favor of Democrats, Trump gained popularity overall as shown by the turnout of his base. What does is suggest to you considering that almost 10 million more people voted for Trump than in 2016? The source of material misinformation is not coming from our side concerning the elections. It is coming from the media and Democrat Party who seemingly have something to hide. Trump wins the Presidental election hands down, possibly even including the popular vote, if the election was fair and without manipulation, in my opinion based on observation, reasoning, and research. Care to take on the indications of election fraud one by one?
Trump did not need all that. He was already sure that there was a crime and he even knew already the exact numbers. He was also already sure he would win when half the votes were only counted. No need to count further he said. At that moment he did not mention any fraud at all. In a real democracy ALL votes are counted. It is clear now why he wanted the counting to be stopped.