Few legal wins so far as Trump team hunts for proof of fraud https://apnews.com/article/joe-bide...nia-lawsuits-b56e0555a2bea650b12f53b979ea7493
Federal prosecutors express concern over Attorney General William Barr's election fraud memo: Sources Sixteen assistant U.S. attorneys countered the attorney general's latest move. https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/fed...orney-general-william-barrs/story?id=74201976 Sixteen federal prosecutors tapped by leadership at the Justice Department to monitor voting in last week's presidential election have sent a letter to Attorney General William Barr making clear that they have seen no evidence to substantiate claims that voting tallies have been marred by widespread fraud or other ballot issues, two sources familiar with the matter told ABC News. In their letter, the federal prosecutors -- career assistant U.S. attorneys from more than a dozen states across the country -- called for Barr to rescind a memorandum he sent earlier this week telling Justice Department attorneys to launch election-related investigations if they suspect significant irregularities, the sources said. Justice Department policy has long urged federal law enforcement officials to refrain from engaging in politically charged investigative activity in the run-up to an election, and the new "policy change was not based in fact," the federal prosecutors wrote to Barr in their letter, first reported by The Washington Post. "We disagree with [your] argument that the impact of taking overt investigative and prosecutorial actions on the outcome of an election is greatly minimized after voting ends but before certification occurs," the letter to Barr said, adding that Barr's memorandum "thrusts career prosecutors into partisan politics." The letter was signed by assistant U.S. attorneys in Arkansas, California, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania and elsewhere. In recent days, President Donald Trump has alleged without evidence that if only legally cast ballots were counted, he would easily be declared the winner of last week's election. But in his memorandum to U.S. attorneys' offices earlier this week, Barr wrote that "[n]othing here should be taken as any indication that the Department has concluded that voting irregularities have impacted the outcome of any election." A Justice Department spokeswoman insisted that line means that what the federal prosecutors wrote to Barr "can obviously coexist" with what Barr's memorandum laid out. "In fact, that is the whole point," the spokeswoman said. "The memo empowers [U.S. attorneys] to investigate substantial allegations of election fraud in order to determine if such fraud has occurred." Barr's memorandum stated "it is imperative that credible allegations be addressed in a timely and effective manner," but Barr said "it is equally imperative that Department personnel exercise appropriate caution and maintain the Department's absolute commitment to fairness, neutrality and non-partisanship." "While serious allegations should be handled with great care, specious, speculative, fanciful or far-fetched claims should not be a basis for initiating federal inquiries," Barr added.
So these 3 people were building machines that could cheat. For months they said nothing about that. And now suddenly they appear. What is different between these two moments??? Ooooh, between the moment they builded these machines and the moment they became whistleblowers, one thing changed. Rewards of ten of thousands of dollars were promised by the Republicans for proof of fraud. And the "fraud" that is "exposed" isin the advantage of the party rthat promised lots of money. What a coincedence! You might even think it could be fraudulous statements. So there is a list of 38 namles of people's vote that were manipulated, if not there is no proof of what they say. Let's see and check that list. Let me guess... they don't have that list with 38 million names on it. They should put all these fake whistleblowers in jail. Till now everybody can try to catch the financial rewards. It uis like a fancy fair, but at a fancy fair the rewards are much smaller and you cannot play for free. If it does not succeed, no problem. You can try for free and as many times as you wish. The list of cheaters that pretend to be whistleblowers grows with the minute.
When people start signing affidavits and testifying in court, under penalties of perjury by swearing to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, and subjecting themselves to cross examination by a skilled defense attorney, that is where the rubber hits the road. My understanding is there have been thousands of such people who have signed affidavits, some of whom are experts who understand electronic voting systems, some of whom were involved in the counting process, and some of whom are involved in election oversight. Quite a few whisteblowers came forth well before rewards were offered. So we have evidence of Biden obtaining more votes than were cast in several states over several election updates, Democrats obstructing transparency and investigation into indications of election fraud, the same discredited media and pollsters attempting to influence public opinion through polls, propaganda, and refusal to address the evidence; a higher standard of proof required by the same entities that accepted popular actor Justin Smollett’s false police report of a hate crime, Christine Blasey Ford’s false accusation of future Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, the false portrayal of the Covington kids by the media for which a large out of court settlement was paid along with other concessions, and a political witch hunt against Trump with the failed Steele Dossier that exposed ethic and criminal violations by the investigators as well as violating the Civil liberties of those investigated strongly lends credence to the idea that Democrats would indeed conspire to commit election fraud. We have seen Democrat prosecutors refuse to prosecute violent and property destroying rioters in Portland, OR to the chagrin of law enforcement and business owners, Christine Blaey Ford was never prosecuted for her false testimony or even seriously called out by the media, and Democrat prosecuors refused to charge Justin Smollett to the astonishment of investigators. The hypocracy of the media is astonishing, as is the massively shifting of stanards concerning evidence before the label of scandal id applied. If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and looks like a duck, more often than not it is a duck. Indications of electon fraud, democrat obstruction into investigations concerning potential fraud, and Leftist media narratives in support of Democrat obstruction, social media and big tech attempts at information suppression as seen with Google requiring an account and signing in to that account to view videos of evidence concerning possible election fraud, and Twitter bans and blocks, and media minimalization of evidence that is presented, all suggests a well coordinated and conspiratorial attempt to influence the election against our voting process and President Trump, of whom they have been strongly biased against for years. Change my opinion.
https://www-politico-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.politico.com/amp/news/2020/11/14/giuliani-trump-legal-plans-436475?amp_js_v=a6&_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQFKAGwASA=#aoh=16053632116439&csi=1&referrer=https://www.google.com&_tf=From %1$s&share=https://www.politico.com/news/2020/11/14/giuliani-trump-legal-plans-436475 Batshit Crazy Rudy throwing a major wrench in the works but since Trump handpicked him...makes sense...
Apply that to Trump. Trump walks like a liar, quacks like a liar, and looks like a liar, more often than not he is a liar. I am sure not a single judge will accept your oneliner as proof. Court needs hard proof. Like the list with over 38 million votes that were switched but cannot be shown as that list is imaginary.