It don't cost $30, it is free. Yeah, I got your review right here, Stranger. That you have not watched it by now, and want to get "permission" via a review, speaks volumes, never mind...
I haven't seen.After reading multiple fact checks saying it was pure bull shit and knowing what a liar Dizua is I had no interest.
Paxton setting the table for wide-scale election fraud based on fake & uncontrolled challenges of ballots while greatly reducing the security of elections. Ken Paxton bucks legal precedent and secretary of state’s advice in letting anyone examine ballots right after elections Attorney general’s opinion invites lawsuits over long-established ballot security and subjects election officials for possible criminal charges. https://texas.votebeat.org/2022/8/24/23320771/ken-paxton-ballots-public-records-election-security
God your incredibly stupid. There was no election fraud. You post endless crap on these topics, seemingly unable to understand any of it.
You both have blinders on and you 9er are out of your depth. Watch the Doc and Debate the Pros and Cons like adults, specified by second by second timestamp on the vid. e.g. that point at 0:32:16 is wrong and here is why. 9er could say. and a respondant, Stranger, for example, could state: Yep, Ya got me there, that's pure bullshit, here's some information that supports your view. This method will help minimize the childish emotional namecalling which is below the standards of discourse and would be extremely obvious when used against Stranger. He would respond chapter and verse in well resoned and well stated fashion his view on that point at 0:32:16. Doubt me? Try it. Say what you will about stranger, he articulates his view without gradeschool level emotional namecalling. If he only had the balls to go view that little 2 hour video he could participate in a civilized discussion point by point. Same for you 9er. 9er, if you look at your response and Tonee! stark, and anyone else who "Read the review and is a Never Watcher", If you take out the namecalling, belittlement, the baseless claims of "the Narritive", then for example in your post above - What is Left 9er? You Got Nothin! 9er, Prove me wrong. and hold the namecalling, belittlement, and bring proof of your claims. Stranger, grow a pair. Get it in gear. https://www.documentarymania.com/player.php?title=2000+Mules >
The following has been established: 1. Electronic voting machines are considered insecure. This is not just a concern of Republicans. I remember when I was a Leftist activist, we were concerned about Diebold, Corporation, those associated with Diebold, and the fact there was a weak or non existent audit trail. Further, Diebold was asked to share their source code, which they never did if memory serves correctly. The other voting machine vendors have similar security issues, including, if not especially, the most prominent one. 2. There are still unaddressed irregularities concerning the progression of the vote tally. 3. There are various issues concerning electronic voting audit trails, a fundamental method of confirming vote integrity. 4. There is evidence that electronic voting machines were improperly accessed while the 2020 US Presidential election was underway. 5. There is inherent risk of fraud involving “Vote curing”. If a vote is ambiguous, how the hell is a third party going to reliably make a determination? In addition, do we really want to count votes by those who can’t figure out how to complete a simple task such as filling out a basic form? Democrats travelled to the five swing states from around the United States to cure votes. Was it dedication to Democracy or dedication to Democrats? 6. There are voter registration issues that Democrats propagate, effectively eliminating voter accountability or even confirming voter eligibility. 7. Democrats have made illegal changes to voting procedures in their districts, as confirmed by some courts. The above should not be considered comprehensive. Sources for above statements are throughout this 241 page thread. Realclearpolitics.com, a political news aggregator, is a solid source. Even Google can help with confirming sources on political issues. The above concerns are just what is top of my mind. While the above is not proof of election fraud, there is certainly enough to establish probable cause for an thorough investigation. An investigation that Democrats have seemingly obstructed at every opportunity, as if there was something to hide. Now I have four questions for you. Consider your answers as an indication of your intelligence and character. 1. Given the above and other issues, is it any wonder than a large number of US citizens have concerns over election transparency and integrity? 2. Is election integrity and transparency important to you? 3. Should it be a legislative priority to insure election integrity and transparency? 4. What would be a reasonable conclusion for people to make if Congress refuses to make election transparency a legislative priority? Most of the US media has characterized election fraud allegations as baseless, yet even so, polls indicate Americans think otherwise. Do you believe all these people are stupid as well? Attached below is a related Gallup Poll: https://news.gallup.com/poll/285608/faith-elections-relatively-short-supply.aspx The above link is to an in-depth article to the subject at hand.
For all you’ve written on the subject, you are unwilling to write a review. As for myself, I most certainly very specific reasons why I do not want to watch and review 2000 Mules at this time. A thorough review by you could change that.
If you are prepared to discuss this Doc timestamped point by timestamped point, I am ready. Otherwise, associated parties and et.al will respond with namecalling, Narrative spouting, unsupported claims, diversion, general belittlement devolving into a pissing contest. The carpet in here smells like a neglected 3-week old primate cage at the zoo. All unnecessary. https://www.elitetrader.com/et/thre...raud-in-progress.352166/page-241#post-5664080