Important!!! New Dinesh D'Souza documentary coming. Very important---watch the trailer below. https://www.msn.com/en-us/entertainment/news/watch-the-trailer-for-2000-mules/vi-AATAe8D
Trump 'lapdog' Kevin McCarthy 'should consider resigning': major newspaper Reflecting on the newly released tapes of House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy telling Republican lawmakers that he would recommend that Donald Trump should resign right after the Jan 6th insurrection -- only to later back down -- the editorial board of the St. Louis Post-Dispatch suggested that McCarthy should step down instead. Labeling the California Republican "Trump's lapdog," the board made the case that McCarthy's desperation to become House speaker at any cost makes him unsuitable to serve in Congress. With McCarthy denying that he ever told his colleagues, "If this isn’t impeachable, I don’t know what is,” before adding, "I've had it with this guy," the board noted that he was exposed as a liar when the New York Times released audio of the call hours later. "This should dispel any lingering uncertainty about the level of this man’s integrity and credibility," the board wrote after previously stating, "Perhaps it’s McCarthy who should consider resigning." Writing McCarthy "... now runs interference for the man he’d declared unfit for office," the editors continued, "McCarthy has refused to cooperate with the House committee investigating the attack. He has publicly ostracized Reps. Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger, the two House Republicans who have put duty and democracy ahead of grubby partisanship to participate in the committee. He has even tried to scare phone companies into refusing to cooperate with the committee’s requests for phone records. To this day, McCarthy refuses to forcefully challenge Trump’s continuing, toxic election-fraud lies." "With the new report, it’s more clear than ever that McCarthy still offers his endless fealty to Trump not because of, but in spite of, what he knows is right. It’s difficult to imagine anyone less worthy to serve in the House, let alone lead it," they concluded.
Have not the Democrats challenged election transparency at every possibility, including seemingly using every available court technique to delay legitimate efforts to investigate election irregularities? Have not the Democrats initiated investigations that were later proved to be under false pretenses against Republicans for short term political gain? Have not the Democrats characterized the January 6th protest as an insurrection? A protest lasting mere hours, ending after a single protester was shot and killed? Have not the Democrats, in conjunction with certain politically biased media companies, created fact checking organizations consisting of their politically motivated interns? Have not legitimate questions regarding the seemingly inconsistent, implausible, or impossible progress of election night electronic tabulation been asked, yet no solid, explanatory answers have yet been put forth? Has it not been established through logs that electronic voting is insecure and have been seemingly manipulated? Have there not been multiple irregularities involving mail in ballots? Is there not evidence that some Democrat precincts recorded more votes cast than voters registered, much less that voters turnout rates were nearly impossibly high by historical standards? Do not Democrats support “No ID” requirements for voting in person? Considering all the above, is it not reasonable for voters to question the transparency, if not validity of the 2020 US elections? Now tell us, where do you personally stand on election transparency? As a heads up, my followup question, should you say you support election transparency, is what policies would you be willing to agree to (And not agree to) to ensure voters can reasonably believe US elections effectively represent the will of the American people?
You're incredibly fucking dumb. You dream up absolute shit and expect people to investigate the stupidity you dreamt up. Go join a Trucker Convoy you would fit right in; in fact, you probably already have.
Why skirt the issue. He asks a valid question. Do you have a stance on the issue? "Now tell us, where do you personally stand on election transparency?"
Get real. The whole post is insane. There is no issue; there was no election fraud. He claimed he'd let it go after some checks were done but apparently numerous recounts and dozens of failed law suits don't cut it.