Debunked. For reasons such as this, it only makes sense to conduct a comprehensive forensic analysis into a representative sample of the strange events surrounding this election. Professionally derived conclusions will resolve much uncertainty whether for the pubs OR the dems.
It certainly does makes sense to continue investigating the election. The future of our republic hangs in the balance. I suspect that John James, David Perdue and Martha McSally won their contests on Nov 3 and it was stolen from them just as it was from Trump. ---This isn't going away folks.
What you post is manifestly untrue in this respect: Although it is true that most of the suits brought by Trump's lawyers and supporters were dismissed by courts on technical grounds such as lack of standing, etc., not all the suits were so summarily dismissed. In a few cases the court heard evidence but rejected it as unsubstantiated, insufficient or defective. Professional polling agencies adopted powerful, statistical methodology after the polling failure in the Truman vs Dewy election. Subsequently, professional polling has correctly predicted, including elections to close to call, the popular vote winner in every election since Truman vs Dewey. Polling predicted a landslide win for Biden/Harris in the November election. And again the polling proved accurate. What you and others would have us believe is that polling in the November election was so drastically wrong as to have failed to predict a landslide Trump victory, as Mr. Trump has claimed he won. You can talk to a mirror and get total agreement, but you'll not budge any rational person with your nonsense. That nonsense has as it's origin Mr. Trump's own delusions. Even diehard Trump supporters acknowledge that he is a liar. So why do they insist on accepting his word that he won the election, despite the improbability of such and the overwhelming evidence to the contrary. Persons who cling to belief in conspiracies so complex that they would require willing complicity of hundreds cause most of us to shake our heads in wonderment of how anyone can be so naive and foolish.
Election Forensics Toolkit and Guide https://www.iie.org/Research-and-Insights/Publications/DFG-UM-Publication "There is an acute need for methods of detecting and investigating fraud in elections, because "the consequences of electoral fraud are grave for democratic stability and quality."" Trust But Verify
You must be aware these posts, like yours above, make you look ill mannered and/or ignorant, so why do you persist?
No they don't. I look at issues with a clear eye and am a straight shooter. I call out falsehoods when I see therm. Most recognize this.
Investigate what exactly? Where is the evidence that should be investigated? And who should investigate? Similar to another thread, it has now been pointed out to you multiple times the specific cases that Trump brought to law courts and each and every single one of those cases was thrown out by predominantly Republican appointed judges. Which violations have you identified that Trump and his entire legal team have not yet found and brought to law courts???
Which strange events EXACTLY? Trump and Giuliani must have overlooked them, you found them and everyone else must have missed them....