https://www.mediaite.com/tv/lou-dob...iracies-after-company-threatens-legal-action/ Lou Dobbs Airs Stunning Fact-Check of His Own Election Conspiracies After Company Threatens Legal Action One of those companies, Florida-based Smartmatic, responded to his comments and those of others with demands for retractions from Fox News, Newsmax, and OAN. In a lengthly demand letter threatening legal action, the company cited comments from Dobbs and others that falsely implied a nefarious link between Smartmatic and Dominion. The letter cited wild speculative comments from Dobbs like, “The states, as you well know now, they have no ability to audit meaningfully the votes that are cast because the servers are somewhere else and are considered proprietary and they won’t touch them.” It also cited comments from Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani on Dobbs’ show, and fellow Fox Business host Maria Bartiromo. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/17/...-false-allegations-about-voting-machines.html Dominion demands that Sidney Powell retract ‘baseless and false allegations’ about voting machines. Dominion Voting Systems sent a blistering letter on Wednesday night to the right-wing lawyer Sidney Powell, demanding that she publicly retract her “wild, knowingly baseless and false accusations” about the company’s voting machines, which have repeatedly found themselves at the heart of conspiracy theories surrounding the election. The letter, a preparatory step to formal legal action, accused Ms. Powell of engaging in “reckless disinformation” about Dominion’s machines at news conferences, rallies in support of President Trump and on conservative media outlets like Fox News, Newsmax and Rush Limbaugh’s radio show.
You are in la la land, again. Liberals tends to be at the extreme ends of the scale. The majority existing for handouts with a few who are very smart and talented. Conservatives are more likely to be productive because the concept of character and community are important to them. Conservatives are more likely to be law abiding, honest, and dependable as well. Tell us again with political party brags about getting the ex-felon vote?
This article is a bunch of noise in an transparent attempt to stile free speech without taking any risks. I guarantee you Dominion and Smartmatic do not have the balls to sue Sidney Powell because of further risk of exposing their all but certain incompetence or worse. Remember, if you sue, you become the one who has to deliver a preponderance of evidence for a favorable verdict, against defense witnesses, some of whom are top experts in electronic voting systems. I expect Dominion’s and Smartmatic’s obvious bluff to be called with them “Instafolding” their bad hand. I am actually hoping for Dominion and Smartmatic to be stupid with them following up with a lawsuit. Please God, just this once!
That all does not help, unfortunately, as stupidity can't be cured. And goodness, there are a bunch of conservative idiots out there. There might be snowflakes on the other side but the average idiocy in camp red is mind numbing.
It is funny that the Republicans choose red as the symbolic color for their party. Worldwide red is the color of socialistic or communistic parties. Maybe a hidden statement of the link between Trump and Russia and China? Ivanka made last year 46 new business agreements with China. I thought that China was the enemy? Ooooh, I forgot: first priority is the Trump wallet. Money goes before anything else in that family. https://www.forbes.com/sites/tommyb...hina-after-trump-was-elected/?sh=3690fe891d60 https://www.forbes.com/sites/danale...mysterious-trump-tower-lease/?sh=2b1521ced11e https://www.politico.com/news/2020/04/24/trump-biden-china-debt-205475 There are hundreds more of this kind of articles. China is a very important business partner from Trump, and Trump does not care about the fact that China will control the US thru Trump's financial dependency of China. Same for the relation with Russia. Trump is selling out the US for his own benefits. No wonder he wants to stay President. Good for his personal business. https://duckduckgo.com/?q=symbolic+...arties&t=newext&atb=v1-1&iax=images&ia=images
Historically, the color Red has been associated with Democrats and Blue for Republicans. Then one year, a particular news outlet changed the status quo by reversing the colors and the other outlets followed. An excerpt from wikipedia: Contents Origins of the color schemeEdit The colors red and blue also feature on the United States flag. Traditional political mapmakers, at least throughout the 20th century, had used blue to represent the modern-day Republicans, as well as the earlier Federalist Party. This may have been a holdover from the Civil War, during which the predominantly Republican north was considered "blue."[5] However, at that time, a maker of widely-sold maps accompanied them with blue pencils in order to mark Confederate force movements, while red was for the union.[6] Later, in the 1888 presidential election, Grover Cleveland and Benjamin Harrisonused maps that coded blue for the Republicans, the color perceived to represent the Union and "Lincoln's Party", and red for the Democrats.[7] The parties themselves had no official colors, with candidates variously using either or both of the national color palette of red and blue (white being unsuitable for printed materials). https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_states_and_blue_states#Origins_of_the_color_scheme Another excerpt: But not everyone liked the shift. Republican operative Clark Bensen wrote an analysis in 2004 titled “RED STATE BLUES: Did I Miss That Memo?” “There are two general reasons why blue for Republican and Red for Democrat make the most sense: connotation and practice,” Bensen wrote. “First, there has been a generally understood meaning to the two colors inasmuch as they relate to politics. That is, the cooler color blue more closely represented the rational thinker and cold-hearted and the hotter red more closely represented the passionate and hot-blooded. This would translate into blue for Republicans and red for Democrats. Put another way, red was also the color most associated with socialism and the party of the Democrats was clearly the more socialistic of the two major parties. “The second reason why blue for Republicans makes sense is that traditional political mapmakers have used blue for the modern-day Republicans, and the Federalists before that, throughout the 20th century. Perhaps this was a holdover from the days of the Civil War when the predominantly Republican North was ‘Blue’.” https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/when-republicans-were-blue-and-democrats-were-red-104176297/ One more excerpt: What's clear is that, prior to 2000, talking about "red states" and "blue states" wouldn't necessarily have resulted in any understanding from your audience. In 1992, David Nyhan of the Boston Globe wrote of his mixed feelings about Bill Clinton's candidacy. "[W]hen the anchormen turn to their electronic tote boards election night," he wrote, "and the red states for Clinton start swamping the blue states for Bush, this will be a strange night for me." You'll notice that those colors are backward, by our current understanding. Nyhan is being figurative we can assume, recognizing the standard red-blue split if not the significance of the colors. But by 1992, networks seem to have mostly settled on red-for-Republican, blue-for-Democrat. The first network to use a colored-state graphic for its election night broadcast was not NBC in 1976 (as this NBC-produced book about election nights would have you believe). It appears instead to have been CBS in 1972, which used segments of the country to illustrate how things were progressing. (The color on this is murky; just know that Nixon -- blue -- ended up winning all of these states.) https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...brief-history-of-how-we-use-political-colors/ There are other articles on this issue, but they seem like they are more “Revisionist” in an attempt by the Leftist media to break historical associations of Democrats and the Communist Party, including their shared associated color of red.
Wonder how long this has been going on? Trump won with 65-70% of the vote, this is a Trump nation. No way so many Dems should be in congress.
In the midterm elections of 2014, a lot of invalid votes got cast and counted including, a lot of illegals (foreigners) including, minors voted in extreme liberal states like California. RINO liberals are fine with that as long as they retain power. US Supreme Court not getting involved with serious allegations of massive election fraud will only make cheating more common with nobody getting punished for their serious crimes.
I suspect that the popular vote in 2020 could have been more along the lines of 80 million Trump and 65 million Biden with 10 million, give or take, illegal ballots. My suspicion takes into account the prospect of flipped votes.
Republicans lost 8 House seats in California during the 2014 midterm elections in areas that are heavily, Republican. 2020, they won 5 of those seats back which shows that cheating did in fact happen in a massive way. There are suggestions that President Donald Trump could have actually, won California. If you remove all the invalid votes, it might have been close atleast. Lots of Trump rallies with atleast, hundreds if not thousands in California attending before the November 3, 2020 election. There are a lot of things that do not add up.