Possible Election Fraud in Progress

UsualName · Dec 9, 2020

BeautifulStranger said:
The people deserve answers to our election irregularities, regardless where it leads. This is a fundamental aspect to Democracy. Hopefully, substantial election reforms come out of this as well so we don’t have to repeat this confidence draining debate.
More...

You got the answer to the phony “election irregularities” claim: Denied.

That’s from the super-majority conservative Supreme Court, Denied as in no and wrong and baseless and stupid and let it go unless you’re a moron.

Denied.
Denied.
Denied.

Ricter · Dec 9, 2020

BeautifulStranger said:
I wonder if there might be...
More...

This captures the true strength of your argument.

Ricter · Dec 9, 2020

easymon1 said:
now youre catching on.
now keep up.
More...

Now you catch up: if "everyone is in on it" except you, you're the crank.

Cuddles · Dec 9, 2020

https://thehill.com/homenews/admini...jects-trump-campaign-appeal-affirms-biden-win
Nevada Supreme Court rejects Trump campaign appeal, affirming Biden win
The Nevada Supreme Court on Tuesday night rejected President Trump's appeal to overturn the state's election results, affirming President-elect Joe Biden's win in the 2020 battleground.

The decision comes after a court ruled last week against the Trump campaign, stating that the president's team was unable to prove that there were fraudulent results due to malfunctions with voting devices in the state, Reuters noted.

smallfil · Dec 9, 2020

gwb-trading said:
More info... this is basically the Supreme Court legal equivalent of "F@ck you, get lost".

Supreme Court Rejects GOP Bid To Reverse Pennsylvania Election Results
https://www.npr.org/2020/12/08/9442...-bid-to-reverse-pennsylvania-election-results

The Supreme Court Tuesday rejected an effort to overturn the results of the presidential election in Pennsylvania, signaling that the high court would not go along with President Trump's unprecedented efforts to win another term despite a decisive popular vote and Electoral College defeat.

The lawsuit was brought by Republican Rep. Mike Kelly, who argued a 2019 state law authorizing universal mail-in voting is unconstitutional and that all ballots cast by mail in the general election in Pennsylvania should be thrown out.

"The application for injunctive relief presented to Justice Alito and by him referred to the Court is denied," read the court's one-sentence order, which did not suggest any dissent among the court's nine justices.

Kelly, along with several others, filed the lawsuit on Nov. 21 and requested Pennsylvania either reject the over 2.5 million ballots that were cast by mail or allow state lawmakers to select presidential electors. Republicans control Pennsylvania's state legislature.

The state Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the lawsuit on Nov. 28, saying the GOP had waited too long to challenge the law.

"Unsatisfied with the results of that wager, they would now flip over the table, scattering to the shadows the votes of millions of Pennsylvanians," Justice David Wecht wrote. "It is not our role to lend legitimacy to such transparent and untimely efforts to subvert the will of Pennsylvania voters."

Associate Justice Samuel Alito, who oversees emergency matters for the court coming from Pennsylvania, had previously given election administrators until Wednesday to file their response to Kelly's appeal.

But Alito moved up that deadline on Sunday, shifting it to Tuesday, the same day that marks the "safe harbor" deadline, which acts as a cutoff date by which states must settle any remaining election disputes and certify their results.

The lawyers representing Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf's administration have said Kelly's claims that Act 77, which enables voters to cast ballots by mail for any reason, is unconstitutional is baseless.

"After waiting over a year to challenge Act 77, and engaging in procedural gamesmanship along the way, they come to this Court with unclean hands and ask it to disenfranchise an entire state," they wrote. "They make that request without any acknowledgment of the staggering upheaval, turmoil, and acrimony it would unleash."

The law was passed in 2019 with widespread support from Pennsylvania Republicans, who control both chambers of the state's legislature.

Pennsylvania certified its election results on Nov. 24, with Biden winning by more than 80,000 votes. Pennsylvania has 20 electoral votes.

Legal blows for Trump campaign

The Supreme Court's refusal to overturn Pennsylvania's election results is a blow to President Trump, who has refused to concede and has spoken openly about his desire for the highest court in the land to step in and help his losing campaign.

At a political rally in Georgia on Saturday, Trump repeated his false and unfounded claims that the election was rigged and filled with "fraud, deception, and deceit."

"Hopefully, our legislatures and the United States Supreme Court will step forward and save our country," Trump said to cheers.

His remarks echoed a sentiment he expressed three days prior in what he said may be "the most important speech I've ever made."

"What a disaster this election was, a total catastrophe," he said. "But we're going to show it, and hopefully the courts, in particular the Supreme Court of the United States will see it and respectfully, hopefully, they will do what's right for our country."

Trump's campaign has filed numerous lawsuits in states where it did not win in the Nov. 3 election, legal moves that have not gotten very far in places like Arizona, Michigan, Nevada and Pennsylvania.

In many cases, judges have offered scathing remark sin their decisions to dismiss various lawsuits from the Trump campaign and its allies.

On Friday, the legal teams of Trump and his allies lost challenges in courts in six states within a matter of hours.

The Associated Press reported Monday that a federal judge threw out a lawsuit that challenged the presidential election results in Michigan, bluntly saying, 'This ship has sailed.'

But that hasn't stopped Trump allies from continuing to test the legal waters.

On Tuesday, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton sued Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, claiming that changes in these states to election procedures due to the pandemic violated federal law. He is asking the Supreme Court to block the states from voting in the Electoral College.

Electoral College electors are scheduled to meet in states across the country on Dec. 14 to cast their votes. Biden is expected to receive 306 electoral votes, 36 more than the 270 he needed to become the next president.
More...

I will give you that one because it is the US Supreme Court. My guess is more lawsuits will reach the US Supreme Court at some point. Will withold commenting on those lawsuits until the US Supreme Court hears it. That lawsuit by the way was regarding the election process. No evidence has been provided and looked at by the US Supreme Court. It may be a different story when evidence of massive election fraud is taken up by the US Supreme Court.

El OchoCinco · Dec 9, 2020

BeautifulStranger said:
It is truly comical that Democrats act like their sole witness is the Second Coming of Jesus, while Mrs Ford, who deleted her social media accounts before testifying, gets shot down, while Republicans are probably nearing a hundred corroborating witnesses, with more likely coming forward each day, many of whom have jobs related to ensuring election integrity, are accused of “Having no evidence” and are “Crazy”.

You might want to salvage some of your credibility and drop this particular CNN narrative.
More...

You might want to stop asigning your comments to me as though you know how I feel. I never stepped into the Kavanaugh fray with comments here so the tactic of let me assign to you what you think so I can shoot it down is amateur at best.

The witness is batshit crazy and has credibility issues as evidenced by another criminal matter of her stalking. She went on a rant in front of the court and lost all credibility if she had any.

CASE CLOSED. Rudy lost.

El OchoCinco · Dec 9, 2020

BeautifulStranger said:
Oh crap, could you call Rudy and let him know? I would hate to see them waste their money and everyone’s time:

Trump apparently stated he will fight, if necessary, until January. Part of the article,
“Justice Ginsburg recognized in Bush v. Gore that the date of ‘ultimate significance’ is January 6, when Congress counts and certifies the votes of the Electoral College,” they said in a statement Tuesday. “The only fixed day in the U.S. Constitution is the inauguration of the President on January 20 at noon.”
https://www.washingtontimes.com/new...ignal&utm_campaign=pushnotify&utm_medium=push
More...

Trump raised millions from duped sheeple to pay off his campaign debts....Rudy is already making $20,000 a day and losing left and right. In my line of work you would get fired after going 0-10 but it seems Trump does not care.

WHo is paying for all these lawsuits by the way? Taxpayers? Nope.

El OchoCinco · Dec 9, 2020

WeToddDid2 said:
https://www.syracuse.com/news/2010/07/documentary_claims_obama_campa.html

Documentary claims Obama campaign 'stole' Democratic nomination from Hillary Clinton

A new documentary called "We Will Not Be Silenced," directed by lifelong Democrat Gigi Gaston, accuses the Democratic National Committee of "depriving American voters of their choice of Hillary Clinton as Democratic nominee" in the 2008 presidential election.

In an interview on "Fox & Friends" on Sunday morning, Gaston said she went to Texas during the 2008 primary between Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, hoping to prove that allegations of voter fraud were wrong.

But Gaston says she has since compiled dozens of interviews with campaign workers and volunteers from across the country who say they witnessed voter intimidation tactics, falsified documents and other irregularities perpetrated by the Obama campaign.
More...

Are you saying the 2008 and 2012 election was fraud and Obama did not beat Biden or Morman guy?

No you are not saying that so you agree the elections have been doen well and the results are valid.

Thank you for seeing the system overall works well, the one that elected Obama and the one that elected Trump and Biden.

Buy1Sell2 · Dec 9, 2020

El OchoCinco said:
Are you saying the 2008 and 2012 election was fraud and Obama did not beat Biden or Morman guy?

No you are not saying that so you agree the elections have been doen well and the results are valid.

Thank you fo.
More...

Only an idiot, or a hyper-partisan, disingenuous fool believes that the 2020 election was fair.

gwb-trading · Dec 9, 2020

smallfil said:
I will give you that one because it is the US Supreme Court. My guess is more lawsuits will reach the US Supreme Court at some point. Will withold commenting on those lawsuits until the US Supreme Court hears it. That lawsuit by the way was regarding the election process. No evidence has been provided and looked at by the US Supreme Court. It may be a different story when evidence of massive election fraud is taken up by the US Supreme Court.
More...

The is no large-scale election fraud. The Supreme Court will not take up a single one of these cases -- all which arrived with no evidence and merely non-factual speculation.