There still is missing information that is necessary to draw an conclusion. I’m taking a nap, but will look at the source information later.
Who claimed it was nefarious? A named person testified, along with swearing out an affidavit. There are others attesting to the same via affidavits. They support their position with a 3rd party video (State Farm Arena security video) Who has refuted this? Who, name the person. Provide a link where they came forward and explained EXACTLY what happened.
If they did not have anything to hide, why did they get rid of the media and Republican poll watchers telling them, they were finished counting the ballots? Why the secrecy. One of the poll workers observed inserting the same ballots in the tabulating machines more than once. There is in fact a security camera video of this.
Their position is that nobody told them to leave. Just a big coincidence or misunderstanding. Uh huh.
That is a BS argument because if they were to say that they were still counting, no reason for the poll watchers on the Republican side as well as the media to leave. Why would they when they are observing the process of counting the ballots? And why were the big, black containers hidden at the bottom of the tables instead, of plain sight if those 4 poll workers were just counting the ballots? Doesn't it seem strange other poll workers went home as well? This stinks to high heavens and the only conclusion one can make is that, these poll workers were committing massive voter fraud. Those ballots they ran thru the tabulating machines obviously, were preselected as favoring Joe Biden and ran thru the tabulating machines more than one time. An audit of the ballots is needed at this point. Invalid ballots need to be removed and nullified then, a manual recount done only on the valid ballots.
You are dreaming again, and did not read what is mentioned there. These are parts the article: "A Michigan judge is allowing a forensic investigation of 22 Dominion vote tabulation machines in rural Antrim County amid claims that votes there were compromised. Trump campaign attorneys celebrated the decision although the case is not related to the presidential contest." So there is a claim, and that claim will be investigated. That's all there is. We saw this now almost 50 times and only 1 time Trump won. What is there to celebrate? 50 attempts? "The order from Judge Kevin Elsenheimer stems from a challenge made by voter William Bailey, who alleges that ballots were damaged during a recounting of ballots in a village marijuana proposal that narrowly passed." Ballots in a marijuana voting were damaged? What has that to do with Presidential elections??? Nothing. "Elsenheimer's order does not mention the presidential race. The county did, however, draw controversy after an error initially showed that President-elect Joe Biden won, even though Trump was later shown to have won by several thousand votes. The county clerk, a Republican, corrected the error, saying it was the result of human error, according to the Free Press. Election officials have said the Dominion vote tabulation machines operated properly. " No mention about the presidential race, and Trump even won there. Does he contest his winning? Was it fraud? OK, no problem, give the votes then to Biden. The error was corrected by a REPUBLICAN county clerk. He even confirmed that it was a human error. Election officials have said the Dominion vote tabulation machines operated properly. Which confirms again that there was no fraud. "In other contested states, recounts have found no evidence of problems with the machines or their software." Like always till now: no proof of fraud was found in any contested state.
From the article, in part: Our team is going to be able to go in this morning at about 8:30 and will be there for about eight hours to conduct that forensic examination and we’ll have the results in about 48 hours, and that’ll tell us a lot about these machines," attorney Jenna Ellis said on "Fox & Friends" Sunday morning. Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani tweeted that it was a "BIG WIN FOR HONEST ELECTIONS." The ramifications of being able to do a forensic examination on the electronic voting machines are clear to anyone who has read the links in the thread and has seen the relevant videos. One question is what areas and how many votes do these particular electronic voting machines represent? If these truly represent the areas in contention, the results should set a course for closure of voting irregularities in Michigan. However, the state that has the biggest cause for alarm concerning electronic voting is Wisconsin. While I have not been keeping up with all the actions in each state in detail, in Pennsylvania, it has been fairly well established that PA election law has been violated by Democrats and PA Courts has acted unconstitutionally in my opinion. My opinion is based on earlier sources linked in this thread.