The funny part is there a paper trail of everything and some of you are desperately scouring for anything you can because Trump told you to. Puppets on a string .
The mail-order, President-Select, has still not yet proved he actually won the election fair and square. With so much evidence of election fraud, he'll need to do that before he can sit in the office.
This sounds like one of the CNN 9 AM talking points. You aren't a puppet on a string are you? Why just repeat what Jeff Zucker, head of the DNC tells you?
There is no evidence of fraud. Absolutely none. There is no onus on election winners to prove there was no fraud in the election. He'll be in office and you'll still be spouting pointless shit on this site. The amazing part about all of this is how clueless some of you have been for years on how absolutely hated Trump is by hundreds of millions of people. And the election proved it; Republicans won the senate and Trump lost. Glorious.
HERE IS THE EVIDENCE Study up.lol https://elitetrader.com/et/threads/here-is-the-evidence.353041/page-3#post-5267499 How is Perjury Punished? A person convicted of perjury under federal law may face up to five years in prison and fines. The punishment for perjury under state law varies from state to state, but perjury is a felony and carries a possible prison sentence of at least one year, plus fines and probation. Penalties are increased in relation to how much the perjury interfered with the proceeding. When the perjurer was a witness in his own criminal trial, his sentence for the underlying conviction may also be increased, on the grounds that a lying defendant is one who has a bad character and is not likely to be rehabilitated quickly. Judges can punish a perjurer who lied under oath to hide or assist a crime in a way that goes beyond the sentence for perjury. That defendant may also be charged as an accessory to the crime he was attempting to hide or assist, if that charge will carry a greater sentence. And a perjurer may even be charged as an accessory to a crime of which he is convicted, if he lied to conceal that crime. https://www.criminaldefenselawyer.com/crime-penalties/federal/perjury.htm A sworn declaration (also called a sworn statement or a statement under penalty of perjury) is a document that recites facts pertinent to a legal proceeding. It is very similar to an affidavit but is not witnessed and sealed by an official such as a notary public. Instead, the person making the declaration signs a separate endorsement paragraph at the end of the document, stating that the declaration is made under penalty of perjury. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sworn_declaration
Au contraire. There is no evidence there is not a fraud. Absolutely none. Since Biden is not the actual winner, there is an onus upon him to prove there was no fraud in the "election" (more like selection). If he does manage to actually sit down in the office, it will be because he had a lot of help from the systemically corrupt pockets of position-holding helpers that represent a sufficient majority of thieves to actually steal the seat. And you'll be here spouting support for the steal, as if it could ever be justified. The other amazing part is how you don't understand that no matter how an office holder is hated, it does not justify election theft. So if you want to pretend to know how many people, worldwide, hate Trump, be sure there will always be a majority that range from tolerate, to appreciate, to love of Trump. That too is probably "hundreds of millions". Here in the US, that was 73 million, about 9 million more than last election (2016), not including all the ballots they managed to actually shred, or otherwise toss in the trash. And if you think Basement Biden--Despacito Joe won more votes than Barry Soetoro at the peak of his popularity, to become the most popular candidate in U.S. history, you are probably too full of hatred to notice your own delusion. Only if fraud can actually prove something. So far it's a selection, not an election. The process will prove it, and yes, this is a process. The process is designed to flush out that actual winner, despite massive cases of potential election fraud. The fact that the House picked up so many seats, and the Senate has held with minimal loss, is a RED FLAG, not any evidence of which you speak. We should not be seeing down-ballots winning on the Presidents coat-tails, without the President winning also.
You're a nut incapable of rational thought. Hard to care what you think. The red flag here is how incoherent your thought processes are. You may see fraud everywhere but it's not how the real world works.
Why are you repeating, like a puppet, the CNN 9 AM talking points? You can't break Trump, so you've been trying to break his base. How is that working out for you?
CNN, the way Jeff Zucker narrates to his narrators each morning, symbolizes all the talking-heads that control the narrative that you are repeating like a parrot. The venom comes from the intelligencia at the top, and flows down through dumb soldiers in the trenches like you, who don't get paid to do this. There are smarter people than you up in the clouds of places like Media Matters. Their narrative flows down-hill in any trench that stinks of hate as much as they hate Trump. Arguably, their selected narratives causes an increase in hate, an increase in stink, ultimately causing an increase in parroted propaganda. I'm suggesting you don't have the independence of thought you think you have.