Back to the indecations of election fraud. Links to the evidence have been provided throughout the thread. From names of witnesses and their video interviews to videos of suspicious activities to forensic analysis of electronic votes. Each day, new evidence is uncovered with new witnesses coming forward and analysis. You repeatedly offer only Ad hominem attacks without any substantial counterpoints. In other words, your argument of no election fraud has failed. You may ultimately win the war with Biden being sworn in, but you and the Left will not likely convince nearly 50% of voters that the 2020 US Presidential elections was not stolen.
There is no reason to argue there was no election fraud. The onus is 100% on you to prove otherwise, and you have failed. Your repeated claim that all the voters who voted for Trump also believe the election was stolen is blatantly false and ridiculous. There are many noted Republicans who have said they do not believe there was any fraud. Are you claiming they voted for Biden instead of their leader ? We do not know what percentage of Americans believe the election was stolen, but it will be less then 10% and may in fact be much, much lower ( like less then 1% ). The fact that some of you are loud and obnoxious about your beliefs ( like Trump himself ) does not add to your numbers. Again, your claim that nearly 50% of American voters think the election was stolen is not only untrue, it's irrational in nature to claim. You can shoot the messenger any way you want to, but it's you that has lost their marbles.
The following is part of the article and a resposted link, but it seems you refuse to read. A similar dynamic is operating today regarding those who have argued that Democrats stole the presidential election from President Trump. Prominent attorneys like Sidney Powell, Lin Wood and Rudy Giuliani have been painted as right-wing kooks, and the press repeatedly labels their allegations of cheating “baseless,” despite hundreds of affidavits from eyewitnesses, inexplicable vote counting anomalies, and blatantly unconstitutional changes in the voting process itself. Baseless? As Inigo Montoya says in “The Princess Bride,” “You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.” https://www.realclearpolitics.com/a..._millions_dont_believe_trump_lost_144744.html
yeah I dont have to prove shit in a forum....just because you posted affidavits does not mean you have proven the election was stolen.... eveyr single affidavit has to be corroberated or it is just hearsay from a lot of sore losers. Plaintiffs have to prove cases beyond a reasonable doubt and I got 48-49 reasons why the case you are making has failed repeatedly. Stop throwing up sworn affidavtis as some magic proof, it makes you look bad. An affidavit is a sworn statement, it is not factual on its own without proof. Like I can sign an affidavit that says I saw you log in with 2 sign ins and you should be banned for life from ET.... It is not true unless I can prove it.
Frank Miele, the retired editor of the Daily Inter Lake in Kalispell Mont., is a columnist for RealClearPolitics. His new book “How We Got Here: The Left’s Assault on the Constitution” is available from his Amazon author page. Come on man, dude is just trying to sell books. If there was anything even remotely credible all these republican judges would be all over it, Barr would have been all over it. Embrace Occam's razor, which is that republicans had a strong showing but Trump turned off enough of them to make the difference in the presidential race.
Yeah----no. Trump didn't turn off anybody. He received 11 million more legitimate votes than last time.
WTH are you talking about? They have to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that their claim is credible.