Lower right frame shows people in the background when the woman says there were only 4..... maybe she cannot count?
Not exactly. A competent judge is not going to compel a defendant to do anything until the plaintiff can present credible evidence to support their allegations. So far the evidence produced by Giulianni and Co. has not been credible.
For what it is worth, some lawsuits are now going to the US Supreme Court where it belongs. This is long overdue. Let the adults decide the serious issues of massive election fraud where it belongs including, all the evidence collected so far.
This is of course false. The cases are being dismissed mostly due to the judges ruling that there is no standing. No evidence has been allowed to be presented et except in Nevada today.
!. I can't see anything in those videos that would indicate anything to me except people moving things. 2. I am as unqualified to look for voter fraud as you are in some random surveillance camera footage. 4. A a great deal is made of no observers being present. So what. Were they supposed to be present. None of us would know.. In most states, absence of observer would simply mean they did not show up. We don't even know what the people moving around were doing. In most states statutory election laws permit a certain numbers of observers to be present when ballots are being counted. But the statutes do not necessarily compel observers other than perhaps election officials to be present. 5. I'll admit, I'm the real idiot here for responding to your idiotic post. I see nothing of any interest whatsoever here. But this crazy video makes a fine conspiracy theory video, I'll grant you that. You can give your imagination free range over the possibilities. Were those boxes, suitcases, whatever , really filled with vials of covid virus. I heard they were, and they were being prepared for deployment.
Good for you. Finally something reasonable, . Yes, indeed, cases can be tossed because the plaintiff has no standing to bring it. To gain standing you have to show you, the plaintiff, not your lawyer, have been harmed; no harm, no standing. And some of Giulianni's are being thrown out for that reason. As I mentioned these cases are not being brought claiming election fraud, they need both standing and evidence to do that. They are being brought on other grounds , grounds on which it may be more difficult to prove standing. Just look at their horrible record. It's clear these are nuisance suits with no chance of going forward. Who are they trying to kid here? Well, I'll tell you who it is. It is you, you naive Trump groupies. You're all fucking fools.
So crank up your apologist imagination and tell us what you could imagine that they are doing? Hmm, this should be good but I doubt you could come up with a counter motive that would make the least bit of sense. Perhaps Georgia officials could explain why the obvious, isn't.
Look. I'm not falling for this bullshit, so don't bother me with it any more. You already fooled me into responding to video nonsense. As our brilliant President George W. Bush said, “There's an old saying in Tennessee — I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee — that says, fool me once, shame on — shame on you. Fool me — you can't get fooled again.”