Are you serious with the 40 people shit?? Out of 75m people on that side, I bet I can find 40 who actually believe they were abducted by aliens, or believe the earth is flat and much weirder shit than that. No doubt the democratic side could find 40 people who would testify to some fraud via post office or whatever had it gone the other way. So Barr is now the swamp, all the judges Trump appointed are against him, it would be really funny if it weren't so sad.
What you are saying works both ways, right? True, but this is a result of justifiable mistrust of professionals. There has been a marked decline in professional ethics in the US after Bill Clinton lied before Congress. Granted Bill was set up over a minor issue for political reasons, but the effect of our President getting caught in a bald faced lie affected the psyche of professionals: “If POTUS can lie and gain popularity, why shouldn’t I” (For a little extra income)”? More specifically, US doctors often give patients the “Medical runaround” for non serious complaints where insurance payments will be forthcoming. Too many dentists and oral hygenists recommend services that are not needed, sometimes marketed as “Deep cleaning” or “Preventative”. Do I even need mention US pharmaceutical commercials? Too often conflicts of interests are not disclosed, even professional to professional. Financial services, anyone? It is mistrust of our professionals, including those in the media that causes people seek alternatives. Honesty is everything. All professions must weed out the unethical because the unethical ultimately hurt us all, including any remaining honest professional. Actually, in one of my linked sources, one security professional firm’s employees were from “Three letter US agencys”, making him a particularly active and credible source on the insecurity of US electronic voting systems. Here is a hypothetical example of an event observed by a laymen and a professional opinion that seems to address the situation with my observations that I based this thread on: I see a person point a gun to the back of someone’s head, the gun fires, there is blood splatter, and the person who is shot falls to the ground and lays still. I call 911, the police and ambulance arrives and transports the victim. I conclude a murder has taken place based upon my observations. Sure the victim could survive. The shooting may have even been legal because it was state sanctioned. A professional expert may be privy to such information. However, based on my observations, are not my conclusions reasonable? Is it not reasonable to demand compelling information by credible sources that an illegal act did not occur? The above scenario is another way to describe the current situation. Many have seen and reported gross statistical anomalies concerning the election. Yet, instead of getting an explanation, we get “Election fraud is not possible”. Can you imagine the corrollary to the above scenario “Murder is not possible” would sound to me? Until we get transparency that includes testimony specific to addressing the many election anomalies, people are going to believe our election was stolen. The characterization of “Harsh terms” is from Leftist media and posters. I don’t know the actual underlying cause of the court rulings or what evidence they considered. There is partisanship in the media, in Congressional investigations, and the courts as seen in the illegal effort in PA to “Legistlate from the bench” on an election law issue in favor of Democrats, against established election related procedures. Further, there was an intimidation campaign in the media against attorneys taking up the cause of concerns by the Trump Campaign. In addition, some potential witnesses may have been suppressed over media generated fears of legal repercussions of coming forward. Severe media bias against Trump with alleged 95% negative reporting, extensive partisanship, media intimidation tactics, the observation of many election related irregularities by many people in several swing states suggest conspiracy, even including Trump appointed Republican judges, is possible. After all, the Bush family, formerly called NAZIs by the Left and a strong political opponent of Trump, have endorsed Biden. We need to clear the air on these issues to ensure people believe the integrity of our election. While your post that I quoted above is of the high quality I appreciate you for, utimately, other readers will make their own determination of value, if any, that our posts possess. As it should be.
“A retired Air Force three-star general reignited baseless conspiratorial claims about U.S. troops’ involvement in clandestine missions in the wake of the presidential election — claims an Army official said are 100% false,” Military News reports. “No Special Forces soldiers were killed while seizing computer servers in Germany as part of a CIA operation after the presidential election. There was, in fact, no mission of the sort.”
I think there was never a President in history that lost so many cases in Court in such a short time. Trump would say: nobody ever did better than me.
Thank you for posting the judge’s statement regarding his ruling. On the converse side, it would be nice to hear a statement fron the losing Trump Campaign attorney in regards to the loss. Trump’s supporters deserve at least that much. As far as the 1-40 record, it certainly suggests incompetence at some level or worse by at least one party. Could not the Trump Campaign have anticipated some of this and avoid wasting resources in possibly unwinnable situations? Very early in this thead I said this will come down to evidence and competence. We have seen defective compliants, Trump Campaign attorneys lacking standing, incorrect defendents, to name a few issues top of mind. This is a also a diservice to the witnesses who have come forward, some under the emotion burden placed on them by a hostile media.
The following is from another thread, started by easymon1. The following are credible interviews of election workers discussing improprieties found in the 2020 US Presidental Elections: https://www.elitetrader.com/et/threads/here-is-the-evidence.353041/ example, FIRST LINE from above post... 4 9 witness videos from Precinct 13: Congressman, Senator, Dominion employee Michigan Photo/Audio/Video 24/11/2020 04:46 PM click of the source likk brings up... https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCekdKDk6d8opUrUEXtXD4XQ/videos Adam de Angeli Sat Heard Pollworker Trainings That Gave Advice Against Michigan Regulations 13K views3 days ago 19:17 Now playing Braden Giacobazzi Talks About Systematic Harassment of GOP Poll Challengers at TCF Center 9.5K views6 days ago 47:11 Now playing Andrew Sitto Talks About Dems Grabbing Ballots Inside TCF Center 7.8K views1 week ago 39:00 Now playing Articia Bomer Witnessed Dems Counting Spoiled Ballots for Biden and Tampering with Machines at Cobo 103K views1 week ago 28:53 Now playing Mich Voter Fraud Witness Shane Trejo Describes 3:30a.m. Illegal Ballots Arriving in Detroit 5.4K views1 week ago 42:34 Now playing Mich Voter Fraud Witness Kristina Karamo Saw Ballots Being Given to Biden in Detroit 28K views1 week ago 34:33 Now playing Mich Voter Fraud Witness Melissa Carone tells the Inside Story of Dominion Machines in Detroit 119K views2 weeks ago 1:19 Now playing Janice Winfrey threatens dog attack on reporter 9.7K views2 weeks ago 1:18:32 Now playing Mich Voter Fraud Witness Patrick Colbeck Describes Fraud in Detroit 8.7K views2 weeks ago 18:41 Now playing Mich Voter Fraud Witness Jose Aliaga saw the 4am Biden Ballot Drop! 10K views2 weeks ago 35:23 Now playing Mich Voter Fraud Witness Ann Rudisill Describes Detroit Election Fraud 5.9K views2 weeks ago 37:12 Now playing Michigan Voter Fraud Witness Hima Kolanagireddy discusses fake, illegal ballots, no Trump votes seen 10K views2 weeks ago 32:17 Now playing Michigan Voter Fraud Witness Barry Doherty describes seeing networked voting machines The first witness I heard was credible. I will listen to more witness statements at a later time. Democrats were extremely well organized across multiple vote processing centers in multiple states. Non Democrat poll watchers and related positions were trained, but were not given a narrative to follow, as was the case for Democrat election workers. This narrative was to supress the efforts to validate to ballots. In addition, how is it the vast majority of ballot processors are Democrats? Are these processors part of protest groups such as Antifa, a designated domestic terrorist organization? What were the hiring standards and were applicants denied employment because of their political affiliation or where they lived? Was there in effect a redlining policy where only those who lived in certain heavy Democrat supporting zip codes would be hired? Was there descrimination based age where political affiliation was not confirmed? Given the extreme media bias and polarization against Trump, is the media complicit in helping to create an environment where election fraud is justified and encouraged? Was does kind of message would you imagine gets sent to potential wrongdoers when prosecutors in Democrat pollically controlled jurisdictions do not prosecute criminal activity, including violent and property damaging riots? Back to the witness statements. The witness gave a couple of examples of invalid ballots being knowingly counted. The systematic counting of invalid ballots alone may justify invalidating the the results of the ballots processing center. Transparency was not maintained as the non-Democrat poll watchers were selectively and apparently exclusively kicked out. Intimidation was used to distract poll watchers from doing their jobs. Why would anyone want to distract poll watchers from doing their jobs? Could it be the distractors don’t want to get caught doing illegal acts? Further, given the number of apparently Lefist legal students on site, what does this suggest the state of our legal profession? The Communists certaintly have targeted education facilities, especially journalism. Now it appears the legal profession was targeted as well. I would like to hear young, Conservative journalists and attorneys discuss their experiences in colleges known for their Liberal professors. If we can find any who attended the colleges in question. If the Democrats don’t want to play nice, why should we? This election is increasingly looking like last call for our Democracy. Hopefully some of the Republican judges that have ruled against the Trump Campaign who still believe in Democracy will recuse themselves and offer their assistance to the Trump Campaign. After all, it is their Democracy, too.
You want judges to turn their back on their job and civic duty and offer personal assistance to Trump who lost the election...but you want Democracy? Judges told Trump lawyers to basically go fuck themselves due to lack of proof of fraud that would overturn the election. Personal stories are not proof, if you think they are then go ask Emmit Till what he thinks of someone's belief/opinion versus facts. Adam de Angeli Sat Heard Pollworker Trainings That Gave Advice Against Michigan Regulations Oh.... he HEARD trainings.....so you admit this is hearsay without direct proof. Do you know what he heard exactly and was anyone else there to hear this and corroberate it? Doubt it because it was one man's moment of fame to claim what he heard. Finding 150 votes with issues is not the type of fraud that will overturn an election. I don't think you understand what Democracy means because it definitely does not mean judges being in the back pockets of politicians and doing their bidding
Except he testified before the Michigan Senate that he had audio recordings of some of the training classes and also submitted that audio to them. Sorry, to burst your bubble.