One Trumptard State Rep is not the entire legislature. Keep your hopes up though, Biden needs to keep winning every day.
Actually, you really want to get stuff taken care of in the lower courts if possible. By the time a case gets to the Supreme Court, the potential scope of a case is reduced, possibly fatally so. SCOTUS is made up of a good number of Textualists and Constitutionalists who are going to demand solid evidence from the plaintiff before considering relief, just like most courts would. Also consider these are more experienced judges than average and who often had notable careers as attorneys. They will not entertain hearing a weak case, regardless of the political affiliation of the plantiff. Quite frankly, looking at the number of cases voluntarily withdrawn by the Trump Campaign and the lack of information in regards to adverse rulings suggests disorganization or worse, which is not a cause for confidence. Especially if the Trump Administration requests relief beyond the scope SCOTUS was intended for in normal circumstances. Trump Campaign arguments that we are not in normal circumstances has to be extraordinarily compelling for there to be even a chance SCOTUS would even consider taking on an expanded role. The preceeding is my non-lawyer opinion only. Again, given my perceptions of the competence of Trump’s legal team so far, I see no cause for excessive celebration, to put it mildly, with getting SCOTUS involved.
Unfortunately, they have to go thru the lower courts and appeals courts before the lawsuits can be appealed to the US Supreme Court. Too many biased, extreme liberal judges in the lower courts. Only the US Supreme Court should be handling issues of massive election fraud. This is way too important to be ignored.
So it fair to say Republican judges are willing to rule against their own party’s political interests under certain conditions, right? Would it be also fair to say that should the US Supreme Court justices rule in Trump’s favor it would be because of the merits of the case and not political affiliation?
When you present zero evidence in courts, what could a judge do? All the 'evidence' you guys keep posting are just accusations, there is literally no evidence for any of the claims. "OMG SERVER CRASHED" "THERE WAS A RAID IN GERMANY" "ANALYSIS SAY BIDEN COULD NOT HAVE GOT VOTES" This is not evidence, these are claims and speculation, not even a Trump appointee would accept it as one.