Pope pisses off Muslims

1. I know, you've represented yourself as a man of God on here for a while now, even though you're an exemplar for a lot of ungodly things, including the use of extremely foul language and lying. Nevertheless, I will ask you this - who said anyone is blaming God? To say that Islam promotes violence isn't to blame God, I don't think. After all, God is God, isn't he? Christian God, Muslim God, Hindu God, Pagan God, it's all one God we're talking about, isn't it? Surely you know that in Hinduism there is no talk about beheading those who aren't Hindu.

2. Of all the people on this site, I have the least to prove to you. You said I was a 'double digit IQ guy'. I just saw a way of getting rid of you forever by challenging you to have the balls to stand behind what you said and have a test to see who is actually the double digit IQ guy. I suspect you fall within the 95-105 range. Your last post is a typical Zevasion, trying to make it seem that your charge was that I am a 'dumbass'. In fact that was not the charge. Goddamn that fucking search function, huh Z? Burned by it again.

You don't have the balls. Case closed.

You have no balls.

_____________________________

Member of the ET Anti-Troll Brigade

iustus ignarus troll

 

So god doesnt exist?
Blasphemy!

 

ZZZzzzzzzz, you may think this is just another shot at you, but I am genuinely curious. I want to ask what may seem to you to be a question with an obvious answer. I just want to see how you answer it.

ZZZzzzzzzz, do you believe in God?

 

I see you are closing cases again.

Too funny.

I don't think I have suggested myself as a man of God at all. I am not sure what you actually mean by a "man of God" since all men are a man of God, given God is the creator of all men. I would have to guess that your intention with the comments of "man of God" are to act in a manner you deem "Godly" but who knows what you think?

Oh, and I do think you are a double digit IQ guy, at least in measurement of practical intelligence. You could score 200 on an IQ test, but you would remain a dumbass...

 

Thanks for proving the case of how people interpret words according to their own mind...

 

Define what you mean by "believe in God."

 

Thank you for proving my point... yet again.

lol... you're getting rusty now that I'm not hammering you every day, Z.


__________________________________

Member of the ET Anti-Troll Brigade

iustus ignarus troll

 

So you ask a question, which I am willing to respond to if you define your terminology, and when the request is made to define the part of the terminology, you fart up the reply below?

You are moving down toward single digits of dumbass IQ.

 

lol... too easy. I knew if I asked you that question, you'd post some sort of evasion/answer a question with a question/Z-ism. I realized later I should have PM'd myself with a prediction that you wouldn't have the balls to just answer the question. Then when you did exactly what I knew you'd do, I could post the PM with the date stamp, owning you even worse than I am right now.

Like I said, you went after that bait way too quickly, Z. It's rust. I do admit that if I want to bait you like this, I should just start a new thread.

btw... yeah, the term 'belief in God' really needs a 'definition of terminology' for you, given your roaring proclamations that you're such a man of God here on these boards. Yes, that makes a lot of sense, doesn't it.

Yes, Z-sense.

Better luck next time.

______________________________

Member of the ET Anti-Troll Brigade

iustus ignarus troll

 

If most Iranians wanted an Islamic theocracy over the Shah, then no American meddling could be successful. The fact is that plenty of Iranians choose freedom and capitalism over Islamic totalitarianism and Communism. There is no such thing as America running around installing governments most people don’t want --another Leftist mirage, by the way. We went in and “influenced” things, sure. The Shah wins and runs the place for decades. Facts are facts: plenty of Iranians liked the Shah. Without that support, we could influence nothing.

In the 70s, however, it’s obvious the Shah lost his way enough to give Islamists the chance to anger the poor. Islamists (like the Left) are always looking for this chance, by the way. Islamists are everywhere in the Muslim World, waiting for any chance to control government, laws, and military. And when a secular government shows signs of weakness, they strike in the name of Islam. Islam is supposed to run government. It’s in the Koran.

That’s why Islamists and the Left are best friends: they both sell humanity short by establishing a perpetual underclass of angry dependent people. Their strategies are different in terms of controlling them with their own anger by passing the blame and hatred to someone else: While the Left blames the wealthy, Islamists blame the “non-believers.”

Therefore, in the 70s, the Shah screws up, gets corrupt and sick. Meanwhile, America has Carter, who proves to the world that America is pathetic and weak, and the Ayatollah tells Iran’s poor that everything sucks all because of the secular, CIA-meddling Superpower of Non-Believing Evildoers.

Iran’s best and brightest flee to the West (not a bad dividend of the Revolution, by the way.) The rest, frustrated with the Shah’s fledgling regime had to hang their heads low and watch their nation succumb to Islamist oppression. Iran would have been a major economic global player today, but Noooooo. Like all Islamist and Communist countries, everyone becomes poor-but-equal surfs, with economies stuck in molasses.

You challenge my ethical principles? What is so unethical about fighting the spread of Communism and Islamic totalitarianism? Why is it that Communists and Islamists always get the moral green light to spread their shit, and we Americans can’t? I bet you think America is the only country trying to influence foreign governments. What do you think CAIR has been trying to do to MY government?