Hillary led with 49 percent meanwhile Harris has 60 percent support, how is this doing worse than Hillary? What damaged Hillary was the third party support which is non existent in current poll. https://morungexpress.com/hillary-clinton-leading-among-young-voters-harvard-poll-finds
The overall range.The Harvard poll has multiple results so I use the overall range,I explained that in the post you quoted. In direct comparison of the poll you are using Harris and Clinton are equal with a lead of 28 points. https://iop.harvard.edu/youth-poll/31st-edition-fall-2016
Clinton was bleeding support to third party, Harris isn't and yet you are claiming she is doing worse than Hillary. Range is irrelevant, Harris gained back the voters that Hillary lost and Trump isn't getting them, that helps in every state.
Your own screenshots prove that polls underestimated Obama by a lot. 2 to 4 points isn't small. Thanks for confirming.
Trumps support was 21% in 2016 and 32% in 2024,so he is certainly getting them and that is why range and overall lead is important.
My screenshots prove what I said,that RCP polls had Obama leading in state polling.You said Romney lead in state polling by a lot Sir. Electoral map won't show how much the state polls got it wrong in 2012 which favored Romney by a lot.
We are talking about margins, state polls overestimated Romney by 2 to 4 points which they can be doing for Trump this time.
Trump support was 28%, I just linked to the poll. The former U.S. secretary of state had the support of 49 percent of likely voters, ahead of Republican rival Donald Trump's 28 percent support
Trumps support was 21%. I linked to the poll,directly from Harvard. https://iop.harvard.edu/youth-poll/31st-edition-fall-2016