Your argument is flawed. Abortionist (most of which) are atheist and not theist yet they kill innocent unborn children. What holy book told them to do that?
We agree, it is only your OPINION that what you "claim" to be contradictions qualify as debunking my belief system. Now this is funny. You spent how much time and energy merely trying to state your opinion is more logical and reasonable than someone else's opinion? The problem is: YOU CANNOT PROVE IT TO BE SO. IT IS JUST YOUR OPINION. OPINION IS NOT PROOF. YOU HAVE NO PROOF, JUST A BUNCH OF OPINIONS. YOU ARE WITHOUT FACT, AS YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT ANYONE ELSE IS EXPERIENCING, SO YOU CANNOT KNOW WITH FACTUAL EVIDENCE THAT THEY ARE WRONG IN THEIR EXPERIENCES. YOU CAN MAKE NO CASE FOR WHAT ULTIMATE REALITY IS OR SHOULD BE, YET YOU VERBALLY ABUSE PEOPLE IN SOME ATTEMPT TO CONVINCE OTHERS THAT YOU ARE THE ONLY ONE WHO HAS KNOWLEDGE OF THE WAY THINGS REALLY ARE, THIS KNOWLEDGE A PRODUCT OF A LIMITED, RELATIVISTIC, AND FINITE INTELLECT. SO IN FACT YOU HAVE DONE THE FOLLOWING: YOU SPENT ALL THIS TIME TRYING TO WIN AN ARGUMENT YOU COULDN'T POSSIBLY WIN FACTUALLY OR LOGICALLY. I TOLD YOU IN THE BEGINNING THAT YOU FAILED WITH THE PRACTICE OF FAITH IN GOD YET YOU DENY IT. BY DEFINITION OF THE PRACTICE OF FAITH, YOU FAILED, AS YOU FAILED TO CHOOSE FAITH OVER YOUR OWN LIMITED INTELLECT WHEN DOUBT AROSE. THIS IS FAILURE TO PRACTICE FAITH. I NEVER SAID YOU WERE WRONG TO FAIL OR THAT IT WAS NOT THE RIGHT CHOICE, SIMPLY THAT YOU FAILED, BUT YOU HAVE SUCH ISSUES WITH RELIGION AND YOUR OWN FAILURES THAT YOU COULDN'T SEE THAT MY COMMENTS WERE PURELY DESCRIPTIVE, AND NOT JUDGMENTAL. MY OPINION IS THAT YOU HAVE ISSUES UNRESOLVED WITH RELIGION, AUTHORITY FIGURES, ETC., BUT THAT IS JUST MY OPINION. IT IS YOU WHO CLIMBED ON THE JUDGMENT WAGON, NOT ME. MY FAITH DOESN'T CONDEMN ATHEISTS, RATHER IT ACCEPTS THAT PEOPLE ARE FREE TO MAKE THEIR OWN CHOICES AND BELIEVE WHAT THEY WANT TO BELIEVE. I NEVER EVEN SAID THAT IF SOMEONE CHOOSES LIMITED RELATIVISTIC KNOWLEDGE THAT THEY ARE WRONG, ONLY THAT THEY HAVE DECIDED TO EMBRACE THAT PHILOSOPHY AND BELIEF SYSTEM. PERSONALLY, I AM INTERESTED IN ATTAINMENT OF SUPREME ABSOLUTE KNOWLEDGE, BUT WHO AM I TO SAY WHAT OTHERS SHOULD CHOOSE OR WHAT THEY SHOULD DO? NOW YOU PRACTICE THE FAITH OF ATHEISM, AND DO NOTHING BUT OFFER OPINIONS ABOUT THE FAITH OF OTHERS, AND ACT IF YOURS SMELLS BETTER THAN OTHERS. LIVE AND LET LIVE IS MY FAITH, IT HASN'T SEEMED TO BE YOUR PRACTICE IN THE WAY YOU VERBALLY ABUSE PEOPLE FOR THEIR RELIGIOUS BELIEF SYSTEMS. ALL YOU HAVE DEMONSTRATED IS WHAT AN ASSUMPTIVE, EGOTISTICAL, IMMATURE AND CONDESCENDING PERSON YOU REALLY ARE.
I was just looking at the poll. It is all about image!! Buddhists have this image of being peaceful and benign but the most violent culture on the planet is possibly Thailand. You can look at somebody wrong there and they go straight for the hitman. They are a Buddhist culture.
No its not, because unlike theism, their atheism is NOT what compels them to commit this act. A LACK of belief is not capable of compelling someone to do anything. I dont believe in unicorns. Does this make me kill people? I dont believe in little green men. Does this make me kill babies? I dont believe in Santa Claus. Does this make me steal? Nope. A lack of belief can never be blamed for compelling someone to do something. You may argue that a religious belief can PREVENT someone from doing something bad, but you cant argue that a LACK of belief can compel them to DO something bad. peace axeman
We agree, it is only your OPINION that what you "claim" to be contradictions qualify as debunking my belief system. Now this is funny. You spent how much time and energy merely trying to state your opinion is more logical and reasonable than someone else's opinion? The problem is: YOU CANNOT PROVE IT TO BE SO. IT IS JUST YOUR OPINION. 777 you are so confused. I am NOT saying that my entire argument is an opinion. Im saying that my argument IS LOGICAL and DID debunk your silly position. That part is NOT an opinion. The word opinion has 5 definitions in websters and in this context I am using definition #4 which is: A judgment or estimation of the merit of a person or thing I am JUDGING the results of this debate. It is my OPINION that my argument clobbered yours. In other words... it is my JUDGEMENT that you did NOT defend your weak position. I DO believe that I have proven this beyond a reasonable doubt. Now to use some of your typical silly reasoning... WHY ARE YOU YELLING SO MUCH??? It must be some kind of emotional response which proves how weak your position is ( Like that poisoning the well?? ) YOU SAID: ...ASSUMPTIVE, EGOTISTICAL, IMMATURE AND CONDESCENDING PERSON YOU REALLY ARE Ad Hominem. Now were on even ground. You just threw away the only card you had. I broke my own rules and didnt stick to strict debating rules because I got so sick of arguing with complete idiots. But now you opened the door Now only our arguements remain, and I have proven yours is full of holes Next time... try an even larger font if this makes you believe it enhances your pathetically weak hole filled position LMAO! peace axeman
LOL! Nope not at all? Is this what you call a rebuttal??? LMAO! Folks.... he's gone off the deep end. This poor FAILED ATHEIST has just lost it Im waiting for more super sized fonts myself This way I can read my monitor from across the living room... haha Super size please! Would you like fries with that??? LOL! peace axeman
Just curious why "Judaism" got any votes as an "evil" religion. AFAIK, it is the only religion listed on the poll that in no way attempts to be "evangelistic"....if you are not a Jew, and don't want to become one, that's fine. If you DO want to become one, that's fine too. Never had Crusades, no Jihad....nothing. So where did the votes come from? If there was ever a "live and let live" religion, Judaism seems to be it. Israel kicking ass to protect themselves is a different issue, and has zero to do with the religion. So why the "evil religion" votes? (I will vomit if I get the "killed Christ" argument).