POLL: The repercussions of a US attack on Iraq

Discussion in 'Politics' started by candletrader, Dec 8, 2002.

Which of these is most likely?

  1. Co-ordinated large-scale bombings of shopping malls and offices (similar to September 11, but not us

    12 vote(s)
    133.3%
  2. Biological attacks on schools, malls, airports etc

    5 vote(s)
    55.6%
  3. Highly co-ordinated machine gun mow-downs of crowds by suicide gangs

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  4. One person suicide bombings (similar to that carried out by Hamas) co-ordinated across numerous smal

    30 vote(s)
    333.3%
  5. Devastating car bombs set to go off amongst traffic queues of commuters crawling into work in the ru

    3 vote(s)
    33.3%
  6. It won't be as obvious as any of the above, but it will make September 11 look like a wasp bite com

    26 vote(s)
    288.9%
  7. No repercussions

    95 vote(s)
    1,055.6%
  1. dgabriel, you have a fearful scenario

    You probably watch Phil Donahue on TV.

    You a member of A.N.S.W.E.R. ?
     
    #831     Jan 23, 2003
  2. You are superimposing - THE RISE AND FALL OF THE THIRD REICH on American History, it wont work.

    You are fearful of the German past history and thinking somehow the United States is going to replicate German History.

    Name one instance that United States, occupied, anyplace in the world and set up a Puppet Government and stole resources, and enslaved people?

    Thats GERMAN HISTORY.
     
    #832     Jan 23, 2003
  3. "any suggestion for the new Bush cabinet position of Imperial American Propagandaminister ?"


    Right wild, Germany doesn't take part in propaganda....their not aligning themselves with the oil countruies to take advantage of somebody elses misfortuen....It's over...Europe is over,,,
     
    #833     Jan 23, 2003
  4. TM I think you could handle that job. I want to be Imperial Vicroy of Iraq.

    Figure it will take me about 10 years to get their heads right, get the WALMARTS built, the resorts on the Gulf, the pleasure palaces and Casino's.

    And start increasing Oil Production. Gas 25 cents a gallon in the US.

    I was thinking of making IRAQ a TAX haven, no Income Taxes.

    Figure I will have IRAQ's GNP up over the Combined European GNP in a coupla years.

    How about a IRAQI electronic exchange, LOL, the IRADAQ.
     
    #834     Jan 23, 2003
  5. How about a IRAQI electronic exchange, LOL, the IRADAQ.


    LOL

    It could probably beat the EU in volume within two years....

    What exactly does Europe produce these days? it seems like Japan and Europe have spent the last 20 years perfecting car engineering....While America has been perfecting computers and planes.......They go 0-60 in 4. seconds with a BMW....we put a shuttle into orbit every 30 days....The French have one redeeming quality.....as soon as I think of it I'll get back to you...the Eiffel tower?....Nah...that's an erector set....French WHine? ...Germany does have some good beer though...You need all the acohol when you wake up in a cowardly country every day with nothing to offer..I'd be drunk every day too..
     
    #835     Jan 23, 2003
  6. The least you can do is recognize there is much more evidence to call it a fact. ,Iraq will be atacked for oil and not for human rights or arms of mass destruction. This is the silliest thing I have ever heard...

    You can defend Bush and that is your right. But defending the fact that the war is not done for oil is a lost case. Even tyhe dumbest lawyer can win this case

    Peace

    TF





     
    #836     Jan 23, 2003
  7. Proof is the absence of any doubt. When there is no proof, only speculation and conjecture.

    If you had no bias, you could not come to any conclusion without proof.

    You might say, "it is possible, but I don't really know." You might say, "it is probable, but I don't really know." So, any conclusion that is drawn, is speculation, not fact.

    That is my point, those who say they know, really don't.

    Extremist thinkers usually substitute opinions for fact to make their cases.

    As far as dumb lawyers, in this country, you are deemed innocent until proven guilty.

    If those who throw out theories and conspiracy theories have proof, I am willing to listen. Prove that Bush is guilty of the charges you levy against him and his administration.

    Fact is that you can't prove it.

    So, when I know someone has an agenda, either too far to the right, or too far to the left, in the absence of proof I don't trust what they say as being valid.

    Same goes for right wing types like Rush Limburger. I don't buy what he says, he has no credibility as he just spins data to fit his agenda.

    That is what I am seeing here from Wild and others, just pushing an agenda, and not supporting their position with factual data or consistently logical conclusions.
     
    #837     Jan 23, 2003
  8. wild

    wild

    Rumsfeld´s German Relatives

    Bargmann-Rumsfeld Anke (04 21) 89 44 22
    28844 Weyhe, Alte Poststr. 14

    Rumsfeld (0 42 02) 28 16
    28832 Achim, Obernstr. 41

    Rumsfeld (04 21) 53 13 27
    28201 Bremen, Friedrich-Wagenfeld-Str. 18

    Rumsfeld Günther (0 42 02) 88 96 96
    28832 Achim, An der Windmühle 21

    Rumsfeld Heinrich (0 42 03) 65 78
    28844 Weyhe, Heidstr. 43

    Rumsfeld Helg u. Gerhard (0 42 35) 81 88
    27299 Langwedel, Schlehdornweg 9

    Rumsfeld Jens (0 61 31) 9 72 93 74
    55131 Mainz, Am Rosengarten 19

    Rumsfeld Margarete (0 42 03) 66 12
    28844 Weyhe, Heidstr. 18

    Rumsfeld Rolf-Joachim (04 21) 2 07 06 18
    28357 Bremen, In den Weiden 9

    Rumsfeld Willi (0 54 41) 29 73
    49356 Diepholz, Hindenburgstr. 25A

    search for Bush, Cheney, Ashcroft ... or even Clinton, Eisenhower, Roosevelt etc. at

    http://www.telefonbuch.de/NSAPI/Anf...c6d7773e3015ec000422c7&TAOID=&BUAB=BUNDESWEIT


    regards

    wild
     
    #838     Jan 23, 2003
  9. You finally provided PROOF



    Proof that there is at least ONE german in this world who isn't a Fascist, racist cowardly pig!!!


    I know it's going to be tougher, but can you find a french man who isnt: a) a coward or b) a pole smoker?
     
    #839     Jan 23, 2003
  10. I agree - great points.
     
    #840     Jan 23, 2003