POLL: The repercussions of a US attack on Iraq

Discussion in 'Politics' started by candletrader, Dec 8, 2002.

Which of these is most likely?

  1. Co-ordinated large-scale bombings of shopping malls and offices (similar to September 11, but not us

    12 vote(s)
    133.3%
  2. Biological attacks on schools, malls, airports etc

    5 vote(s)
    55.6%
  3. Highly co-ordinated machine gun mow-downs of crowds by suicide gangs

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  4. One person suicide bombings (similar to that carried out by Hamas) co-ordinated across numerous smal

    30 vote(s)
    333.3%
  5. Devastating car bombs set to go off amongst traffic queues of commuters crawling into work in the ru

    3 vote(s)
    33.3%
  6. It won't be as obvious as any of the above, but it will make September 11 look like a wasp bite com

    26 vote(s)
    288.9%
  7. No repercussions

    95 vote(s)
    1,055.6%
  1. World : last updated, March 18, 2003 23:44

    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/section/0,,144,00.html

    Saddam gives OK to chemical weapons

    Saddam Hussein has given field commanders the authority to use chemical weapons on their own initiative, without any further directives from the Iraqi leadership, says the Pentagon. Intelligence reports indicate a high risk that Iraq would use chemical weapons against allied troops. "We continue to receive reports supporting the assertion that there is a high risk the Iraqi regime would use chemical weapons at some point during any conflict," said Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman .
     
    #1671     Mar 19, 2003
  2.  
    #1672     Mar 19, 2003
  3.  
    #1673     Mar 19, 2003
  4. ElCubano

    ElCubano

    Finaly an admission....:D
    The first step is always the hardest, I am sure that the harder you work at it the less of a moron you will be....good luck
     
    #1674     Mar 19, 2003
  5. Well then... it will just be that much easier for you to live in your fantasy world where you are kicking my ass in some parking lot in Little Havana.
     
    #1675     Mar 19, 2003
  6. The CIA was in constant contact with military leaders to make sure that U.S. warplanes did not bomb CIA operatives already in Iraq, the sources said, speaking on condition of anonymity.
    They also revealed that intelligence reports were indicating that Saddam was preparing to use chemical weapons against U.S. troops.
    Intercepts of Iraqi military radio communications suggest that artillery shells with chemical warheads were being handed out to troops of Saddam’s elite Republican Guard at Al Kut, southeast of Baghdad, the sources said.

    Other evidence indicated that preparations were under way to coat bridges and roadways with a lethal VX nerve agent to slow U.S. troops on their advance to Baghdad.
    U.S. intelligence reports also indicated that Saddam had as many as 50 unmanned drones he could use to attack U.S. troops with chemical weapons from

    ==============================================

    THERE ARE NO WMD'S IN IRAQ....FRANCE AND MSFE SAID SO...WHERE IS WILD AND HIS MASFE ALTER EGO THESE DAYS???
     
    #1676     Mar 19, 2003
  7. In the bunker?
     
    #1677     Mar 19, 2003
  8. msfe

    msfe

    in Lugano www.lugano.ch - waiting for the liberation and democratization of Switzerland by the "coalition of the willing"
     
    #1678     Mar 19, 2003

  9. Why would we liberate pathetic and cowardly people like the swiss? I could take them over myself with a bat and some check books....half the people would surrender to me ..the other half would kill each other just to get my account in one of their corrupt swiss accounts.
     
    #1679     Mar 19, 2003
  10. Switzerland? You must have meant Sudetenland. In any event, the Iraq invasion is not like your pal's "entrance" into that area, even bloodless as it was.
     
    #1680     Mar 19, 2003