POLL: The repercussions of a US attack on Iraq

Discussion in 'Politics' started by candletrader, Dec 8, 2002.

Which of these is most likely?

  1. Co-ordinated large-scale bombings of shopping malls and offices (similar to September 11, but not us

    12 vote(s)
    133.3%
  2. Biological attacks on schools, malls, airports etc

    5 vote(s)
    55.6%
  3. Highly co-ordinated machine gun mow-downs of crowds by suicide gangs

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  4. One person suicide bombings (similar to that carried out by Hamas) co-ordinated across numerous smal

    30 vote(s)
    333.3%
  5. Devastating car bombs set to go off amongst traffic queues of commuters crawling into work in the ru

    3 vote(s)
    33.3%
  6. It won't be as obvious as any of the above, but it will make September 11 look like a wasp bite com

    26 vote(s)
    288.9%
  7. No repercussions

    95 vote(s)
    1,055.6%
  1. Twas the Saudi money, the Saudi hijackers, and the Pakistani terror training networks that hit us on September 11th, not the Iraqis... if you read my post, I have strongly supported taking military action against the Saudis and Pakistanis... so I do indeed have a dick, Brother TM_Direct... and I am NOT a pacifist...
     
    #1641     Mar 17, 2003
  2. ok 'brother' candle........then if you feel that way stop using possible terrorist attacks as a way of saying " i told you so"...it seems like most democrats are banking on the hope that there will be another strike and then they can say " told you so" when in reality we have been on high alert for a year an a alf anyway without a war on Iraq.......also, If you think about it , when you topple two mid-east countries in less then a little over a year after 9-11...it send a strong message to these government sto to get their mutants under control
     
    #1642     Mar 17, 2003
  3. ges

    ges

    Dang....got spittle flecks all over my monitor from that one.

    :p
     
    #1643     Mar 17, 2003
  4. What is going to be really amusing is when after the war is all settled and Iraq is being rebuilt better than before, all these supposed anti-war types will leave the message board or change their aliases ! HA HA HA
     
    #1644     Mar 17, 2003
  5. bobcathy1

    bobcathy1 Guest

    I wonder about men.

    All you guys argue about the merits of war while sitting on your fat asses drinking a Bud. "Let's go annihalate their commie asses", but I do not see you going over and hunkering down in a sand dune, sweating your cohones off waiting for a stray bullet to make you a dead hero. Nooooooo.

    Women are so much more civilized.:D
     
    #1645     Mar 17, 2003

  6. ....Right!...all women are concerned about is laying on their backs , wearing their ankles as earrings and hoping this drunk guy they just took home is a sugar daddy so they don't have to work and then in five years they can leave him and get half of everything he worked so hard for!!
     
    #1646     Mar 17, 2003
  7. Hah! I see your girl Hillary is hedging bets by not commiting herself at the moment, although she previously (and very smartly) voted in favor.
     
    #1647     Mar 17, 2003
  8. bobcathy1

    bobcathy1 Guest

    Is Hillary really a WOMAN????

    I do not think so......she is some sort of reptile?

    Hey, do you know anyone I can marry and take the bastard for half his money????? I am sure I could make the sucker beg for divorce!

    That would sure fill the cruising kitty for Bob and me with a lot less work.....:D :D
     
    #1648     Mar 17, 2003
  9. We need to send you to Iraq; no stray bullet is going to affect your cojones.
     
    #1649     Mar 17, 2003
  10. bobcathy1

    bobcathy1 Guest

    :D :D
     
    #1650     Mar 17, 2003