POLL: The repercussions of a US attack on Iraq

Discussion in 'Politics' started by candletrader, Dec 8, 2002.

Which of these is most likely?

  1. Co-ordinated large-scale bombings of shopping malls and offices (similar to September 11, but not us

    12 vote(s)
    133.3%
  2. Biological attacks on schools, malls, airports etc

    5 vote(s)
    55.6%
  3. Highly co-ordinated machine gun mow-downs of crowds by suicide gangs

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  4. One person suicide bombings (similar to that carried out by Hamas) co-ordinated across numerous smal

    30 vote(s)
    333.3%
  5. Devastating car bombs set to go off amongst traffic queues of commuters crawling into work in the ru

    3 vote(s)
    33.3%
  6. It won't be as obvious as any of the above, but it will make September 11 look like a wasp bite com

    26 vote(s)
    288.9%
  7. No repercussions

    95 vote(s)
    1,055.6%
  1. Ha! You are so funny... but I do pity your lack of brainpower :D :D :D That's something you should see a neurosurgeon about!!! LOL

    yeeeeeeeeeeeeehhhhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaa!!!
     
    #1211     Feb 11, 2003
  2. Indeed I feel somewhat sorry for people like you and KymarFye, but its kind of fun dealing with your inanities... yeeeeeeeehhhhhhaaaaaaaaaa :D :D :D
     
    #1212     Feb 11, 2003

  3. Yeah, I think we should give Iran a good bombing... after all, they are the true threat to Israel, and not Iraq... Iraq is defenseless, and ya know it... at least I make sense... :D :D :D
     
    #1213     Feb 11, 2003

  4. ROFLMAO... if I am a socialist, then pigs can fly!!!! yeeeeeeehhhaaaaaaaaa :eek: :eek: :eek:
     
    #1214     Feb 11, 2003
  5. BIG SHOW

    BIG SHOW

    #1215     Feb 11, 2003

  6. ROFL! .... go use it on Iran and leave defenseless countries like Iraq alone... yeeehaaaa :cool: :cool: :cool:
     
    #1216     Feb 11, 2003
  7. Uh-huh. If you are indicative of a "neutral" Switzerland, Candle's going to enlist in the Marine Corps this very day (of course he'd be rejected immediately, but give him points for trying).
     
    #1217     Feb 11, 2003
  8. :confused:
     
    #1218     Feb 11, 2003
  9. rs7

    rs7

    Interestingly, under the Shah, Iran and Israel were actually allies.
    Not that those days matter much now. But somehow the people of Iran seemed to have nothing (or not much) against Israel. On the other hand, Iran had a substantial Jewish population then (they all moved to Long Island since), and the Shah was an American backed dude who knew how to make himself a birthday party even better than my wife!

    Peace,
    :)Rs7
     
    #1219     Feb 11, 2003
  10. Yeah, all of what you say is true... but look at the Iranians NOW... they cause more terror in Israel than Iraq ever did... if anyone is a source of concern its IRAN, not IRAQ... Bush Baby is obviously confusing his N's and Q's... we are bombing the wrong people cos Bush can't spell...

    yeeeehaaaa :D :D :D
     
    #1220     Feb 11, 2003