POLL: The repercussions of a US attack on Iraq

Discussion in 'Politics' started by candletrader, Dec 8, 2002.

Which of these is most likely?

  1. Co-ordinated large-scale bombings of shopping malls and offices (similar to September 11, but not us

    12 vote(s)
    133.3%
  2. Biological attacks on schools, malls, airports etc

    5 vote(s)
    55.6%
  3. Highly co-ordinated machine gun mow-downs of crowds by suicide gangs

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  4. One person suicide bombings (similar to that carried out by Hamas) co-ordinated across numerous smal

    30 vote(s)
    333.3%
  5. Devastating car bombs set to go off amongst traffic queues of commuters crawling into work in the ru

    3 vote(s)
    33.3%
  6. It won't be as obvious as any of the above, but it will make September 11 look like a wasp bite com

    26 vote(s)
    288.9%
  7. No repercussions

    95 vote(s)
    1,055.6%
  1. LOL :D

    The crap that powell spewed from his jaws was nothing more than circumstantial drivel... of course it could easily persuade the IQ deficient buffoons out there (including those on ET) who can't think for themselves, but that's their problem not mine :) ...

    As Scott Ritter said, powells bullshit was nothing more than an attempt to discredit the efficacy of UN weapons inspections, which are the biggest obstacles to the forthcoming oil crusade...

    The only credible way to continue the process is to allow the UN weapons inspections to continue... a unilateral and illegal attack by the USA makes the USA a highly legitimate target for those who wish to punish people who break international law...

    Thankfully, the rational heads around the UN table giving responses to powell's speech outnumbered those who wished to get into bed with the USA...

    God Bless USA and all members of the US policy-making team who hold both American and Israeli passports... yeeeehaaaaa... let's smoke em out and give em justice...

    :cool: :cool: :cool:
     
    #1161     Feb 6, 2003

  2. Don't start getting all sentimental with me!! ROFL :D

    This is an absolute drop in the ocean of humanity compared to the number of people that US foreign policy has murdered...

    yeeeeeeeeeehaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!!!!!!!! :cool: :cool: :cool:

    God Bless America and Israel...
     
    #1162     Feb 6, 2003
  3. msfe

    msfe

    hapaboy:`Did Powell's presentation do anything at all to pierce the veils of your smoggy craniums and illuminate in some small way the dangers facing the US and indeed the world?´

    no
     
    #1163     Feb 6, 2003
  4. candle,

    i must say, you continually impress me with the size of your ego, but that's about it.. :(
     
    #1164     Feb 6, 2003
  5. If you were a hot female, I would try my hardest to impress you with the size of my mid-body protusion too... ROFL :D :D :D

    God Bless America and Israel...
     
    #1165     Feb 6, 2003
  6. msfe

    msfe

  7. msfe

    msfe

    #1168     Feb 6, 2003
  8. Hmmm, not relevant at all, huh? Good grief, I don't think you'd be satisfied unless the weapons inspectors found a shell tipped with a VX cone, stenciled with "For the imperialist Americans in Washington, D.C." Then you'd argue that the shell was merely a palace ornament hustled out of Saddam's display case.
    Ah, Scott Ritter, that noble leftie who likes to have underage girls he's met on the Internet watch him jerk himself off. A man admittedly arrested in 2001. Very credible, Candle, and indicative of the sources you believe in...not altogether surprising, though. You obviously believe your own president is far more evil than Saddam.
    Until what? You won't be satisfied regardless of what they find.
    Yeah, the "rational heads" like France and Germany who will lose billions (much of it illegal) they've negotiated with Saddam if there's a war. Speaking of heads, you need to pull yours out of where it currently resides, wipe it off, and wake up. :D :D :D
     
    #1169     Feb 6, 2003
  9. Pathetic article. Claims that "UN activity from 1991 to 1998 had destroyed active ingredients as well as the means of producing nearly all biological and chemical weapons." Oh, how relieved I am. "Nearly all..." hmmm, so those tons of missing VX and anthrax that have never been accounted for are inconsequential.

    "Swiss experts" - ROFL! :)
     
    #1170     Feb 6, 2003