POLL: On average, which ET group is more intellectually dishonest? Atheist or theist?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Thunderdog, Apr 14, 2009.

On average, which ET group is more intellectually dishonest?

  1. Atheist

    10 vote(s)
    26.3%
  2. Theist

    28 vote(s)
    73.7%

  1. Thank You

    After a long hard day of watching missed opportunities, I was grappling for a polite responce...I think you summed the matter up quite well.
     
    #51     Apr 16, 2009
  2. Why I even take the time to address you when you can't understand that I am an agnostic after more than a paragraph of agnostic views is beyond me.
     
    #52     Apr 16, 2009
  3. stu

    stu

    Translation:

    "Just like U Optional777, I realize we both have no real argument "
     
    #53     Apr 17, 2009
  4. Cutten

    Cutten

    You look at the available evidence, and make your best judgement.

    My criteria is that the more and better quality evidence there is for something, the more I will take it on board as a possibility. Also, the plausibility of the idea must be taken into account. Implausible things with no evidence to back them up are occasionally true or real, but that's not the way to bet - most times they are just BS. E.g. the tooth fairy, the Yeti etc.

    1000 years ago, AFAIK there was no evidence for cosmic rays existing, based on human knowledge at the time. If that is true then the odds were against them existing.

    Remember that scepticism is a pragmatic technique for trying, under conditions of limited knowledge, to assess which out of countless theories and propositions are most likely to be true. In 1009 AD, there were doubtless many theories with little or no supporting evidence, almost all of which would turn out to be totally wrong. That a few of these unsupported theories turned out to be right simply means that - at the time - they were a lucky guess. Guessing and relying on luck has historically not proven to be a good way of judging whether theories are right or wrong. Favouring theories based on their supporting evidence, on the other hand, has proven to be pretty successful and that is why it is the basis of scientific thinking.

    My question in return would be "How do you know God exists?". What criteria are you using to form this belief, how would you know if you are wrong etc.
     
    #54     Apr 17, 2009
  5. Evidently, you feel the same way about the English language.
     
    #55     Apr 17, 2009
  6. Why indeed. And yet here you are. So then humor me and tell me what your views are, and what are the facts that "represent" those views.

     
    #56     Apr 17, 2009
  7. Exactly how do you calculate the odds on whether or not God exists?

    What exactly is your criteria by which you generate those odds?

     
    #57     Apr 17, 2009
  8. How do YOU calculate the odds for his existence @ 100%? :D
     
    #58     Apr 18, 2009
  9. You are not able to answer my question, so what do you do?

    Act the fool...

     
    #59     Apr 18, 2009
  10. obviously you can't be certain, and you know this now who is the fool :D

    the funny thing is and has been all along.. you don't even know what IT is you are certain of! :D
     
    #60     Apr 18, 2009