clearly, you should second guess anything CBS spoon feeds you ... if you'd like to continue, I CAN get uglier
Your liberal rags the NYT and NBC estimated 300,000 which is why you lefty hacks are all up in arms. If you think it was 87K, then I think Obama's inauguration only drew 125K.
I dont care either way, who cares how many attended. But I dont see the point of blaming CBS for relying on 'scientific' crowd counting rather than pure guestimates.
You can think anything you want, I'd take the guy on his word who seem to be a non-partisan than anybody else. He counted down Obama's inaugration figures as well.
"Scientifc" crowd? What a bunch of bullshit if these supposed scientists were not smart enough to look at the size of a crowd which is actually perfectly measured such as a football stadium which is at capacity, and they can not figure out just by looking from overhead that there is clearly a much larger crowd then that then these guys are not scientists. It would be like looking at a bowl where i know there are 10,000 marbles in it because i counted them 1 by1, and then looking at another bowl which fits the same volume which is much fuller and estimating i have 5000 marbles.
well, your entire thread, and most of your personal beliefs as it relates to the 'tea party' movement, rely directly on CBS statistics. you don't seem like a bad fellow, just HORRIBLY misdirected
Poll: Jon Stewart Most Trusted Newsman In America http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/22/time-magazine-poll-jon-st_n_242933.html